Well what i mean is more that the j10c’s biggest additions are the AESA radar being produced domestically and the pl10 and pl15 missiles which would be too potent for the game currently. Where as the J10b still gets an AESA radar, but retains Pl8 and PL12 which don’t push the envelope. Unless the snail really is going to jump to those levels of missiles soon. Probably have to grind out the same plane twice just to have better missiles otherwise which i think is a poor solution tbh.
3 Likes
understandable mate, if the spyder gets revealed the celebration would be huge
1 Like
I saw that few times someone mentioned Patria AMV with Hellfire launcher as US experiment, case it was done by Lockheed Martin.
But also i saw an official document from Lockheed Martin UK, and they are say it was done by them.
What do you think?
1 Like
well LM UK is still LM. afaik there is no special seperating agreement like with BAE US and main BAE. however for this one i think it can go to UK because 1. its not an american vehicle 2. UK has been using hellfires for years. if the UK army tested this then UK for sure. if it was only ever tested by LM then its more questionable
To give China a 14.0 aircraft
The B is pretty much a sidegrade at best compared to the A (in terms of WT gameplay)
It’s much heavier with negligible improvements to thrust 132KN
An IRST
A better Radar
Armaments are pretty much the same except it should get access to 2 AGM’s hopefully the CM-704KG
The C has the same airframe but a much Stronger Engine 142KN
And should get access to the 2 AGM’s and a dual belly pylon for PL-12’s
So all in all to compete with the Rafale and EF2K and such the C is a better option.
1 Like
Not 2 AGM, C could take 6*GB250 in IR version, but not sure if it can take rocket version in 6
now that i think of it. J-10C, F-2A, F-16E/V would be a pretty amazing single engine fighter lineup for an update
Gaijin not add other aircraft piston-engine rank IV, the early 1st gen jet fighter aircraft from USN and night fighter aircraft 6.7 - 7.7 for a long time
Never seen a IR guided GB250’s only BeiDou guided ones
And it can still carry the AGM’s nothing stops it
J10b would still be stronger than the f18 late, so it could already be 14.0. That or the F18 late shouldn’t be 14.0.
should be 4, still not much but usable
it’s LS-6 actually
AA with HN-6 is useless, China don’t need 9.0-10.3. China needs its pure 12.0 AA
FB-10A have Dual mode guidance IR/SACLOS
He’s talking about the triple rack of GB250 seen on the CE
And if you have an image of it carrying 4 AGM’s please share I’ve only ever seen it with 2
There’s no mention of SACLOS on the manufacturers site only DL and IIR
Nope, they don’t. They make the Skyranger 30/35, but those are Gun based SHORAD systems (with the 30 having the option to add manpads), basically Gepards on Crack. At best they’re 10.7 worthy. Our SAMs get built by Diehl Defence, but we don’t have any in the 20km range. SLS is a 12km system and after that it jumps straight to 40km with the SLM, nothing in between. And Germany doesn’t even use the SLS, out shortest range SAM is the SLM (if we ignore Manpads for now)
1 Like
LS-6 has IR seeker version and can fit this pylon
You’re gonna have to provide some proof for that my guy the LS-6 will definitely not fit that pylon nor have I seen an IR kit for it
Can ERA VT5 be seen in the next release. All his work should be done.
1 Like
Wouldn’t that just be a heavier VT-5? I doubt the added side ERA would save you from anything.
Rather hope they add the ZTQ-15