Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

[Fireraid233]

Gaijin doesn’t allow fun.

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

Why ? when? whats the point… its so hard thing to do and impossible at some points and they remove it? We can cap in naval so why was ground capping removed?

[Morvran]

About a year ago I think

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

Man… how did I miss that?

[Morvran]

Make aircraft able to capture zones (again)

poll Years ago, after helicopters were added to the game, it became possible to capture points in combined arms games by landing an aircraft on a capture point, as long as you were stationary and intact on the ground within the cap point. This was a great game mechanic, even though the opportunity to capture points with aircraft was rare. On many maps it’s impossible to land on any points, and attempting landing on combat zone would often either fail or have you shot down by the enemy tanks on …

So more like 2 years ago actually

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

Yes please sign me in I want it back.
2 years is about the time I havent landed on any points so that checks out.

[luque13]

Are there any plans to rework NATO NERA armour?
Getting fed up of Russian magic ERA being a catch all
1200m pen AGM65 no problem,
DM53…sure nothing can pen it and as a game that pretends to be realistic this has been an issue for a long long time now.

And no I don’t care if Russian tanks will suffer if they have realistic ERA modelled.

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

I guess I havent noticed since I am not really the “landing kind of person” yk yk.
Last time I landed in goofy place was like a year ago enemy carrier to show off dominance.

[AWACS_Ghost_Eye1]

Tfw boarding party in a ww2 game

[阿依土鳖的罗初]

The Soviet Union gained T-38-85
This China can be active with 85mm APFSDS T-34-85 gai

[Deathmisser]

Please gaijin Thai VT-4 for Japan, we got their aircraft now for their tanks

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

Yeah bro. My pilot then got off the plane and captured whole carrier with nothing but pistol and sword.

[MythicPi]

Lowkey really smart imo. Really should have a backup optic on most systems, and an EO system doesnt take much space or cost comparatively. I wish more systems did this.

[AWACS_Ghost_Eye1]

No. From the perspective of a guy grinding japan. Its mid as hell, probably doesnt even deserve mid. I dont mind it being added but its mid.

[el_Argentino]

Malvinas devblog tomorrow?

Spoiler

warm up time

[Deathmisser]

You know me by now, I want pure sub line up’s how can I not have the VT-4 lol

[DevilO6]

Grifo can do it too.
Idk about SLM.
I thought MICA VL can do it, but i was mistaken.

[阿依土鳖的罗初]

Prone angle -5 reloading time 7.1 Forward speed 65, retreat 16 466 strokes

Weaker protection(Only FY2）

VT4A1 is already very poor, VT4 will only get

worse, and BR will not be lower than 11.3

[TheKnightOfZero]

Can you move this to topic on its own, not the RR topic as not the right place !

[侍KAMIKAZE侍]

I can yes. Will please devs explain why was it removed or why isnt it readded in this threat then : Make aircraft able to capture zones (again)
Thank you very much!