Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

My best vriend @Smin1080p_WT, you know that every leak from Gszabi, Olivia, Chinese guy and Mike Ehrmantraut are considered as “Holy Scrolls” in this community.

Whatever the “Divine Artefacts” tell us, is considered a glimpse of what the future holds, a magical text - that predicts the future additions.

So when the “Type 625” is listed on the “Holy Scroll”, consider the vehicle as announced.

MMM04052024093539

Please don’t harass the staff with them.

14 Likes

I shall spread the ENLIGHTMENT!

A vehicle is offically annouced once it:

  1. Has a dev blog: War Thunder — Realistic Military Vehicles Online Combat Game for PC, Xbox and PlayStation. Play for Free News
  2. Is shown on an offical stream
  3. Is listed on the update notes

If it has none of the above, then its not announced and as you will very well know, we don’t comment or speculate (outside of the odd tease in the news) things that are not yet announced.

14 Likes

Issue is 3km range is not equivalent to 2S6, has to be much better than that.

They obviously can’t and won’t engage. There is no point. The only result will be disappointment for you, annoyance for them, and frustration for both.

17 Likes

Possible modeling error.

Use of different sources to model the chassis.
They started out developing one but changed it midway and so on

1 Like

I’m not mad or dissapointed.
Smin knows i’m messing around, i know the answer already.

Just some lore behind the leaks thats all ♥

I am the number 1 Ajax hater, we should’ve picked CV-90, the fact that I also think its ugly really doesn’t help, if it was ugly and good, i’d be chill but its a hexagon with some stuff bolted on imo.

Proof? And especially need proof for the second bit. Maybe against whatever the EFT has, but vs AN/APG-77 full blast in EW setup? Yeah right

*annoyance for all

1 Like

image
image
image

come on gaijin! make it happen :)

5 Likes

Or just picked Stormer fleet to replace CVRT in the 90s and have completed a project decades earlier and saved big bags of money to maybe even have CT40 turrets xD

Stormer/CVRT weren’t the only things that needed replacing though. Warrior also needed replacing as well.

But yeah they definitely went the wrong way about the project and if they wanted a ‘do it all vehicle’ an unproven vehicle that had hardly had any export success was not the play, the play was the immensely popular vehicle everyone else in Europe used and had numerous variants, and all they had to do was add their own turret.

Is it just me having low fps at the start of the match?

Idk man, i have an average of 15 so i dont feel it.

Didn’t think it did

Yep people need to learn how to cope with stuff, annoying a bunch of people is only end up with them blocking him

1 Like

No F-15 uses the APG-77. The F-15C that we were talking about (The APG-63(V)1), is what I was referring to. For sensor integration, it’s pretty simple. The TCS and IRST connect to the radar and RWR. These also have higher resolutions due to the massive PTID the F-14D has. For the RWR, it’s just older tech. ALQ-135 vs ALQ-165.
Sources: https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=993
https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_pdf.cfm?DACH_RECNO=321

Sorry to bother you, but in the dev blog it states “the Badger IFV tops off Great Britain’s light tank line” does that mean there’s going to be a slight shuffle of the UK tree? As (at least at around the BR of similar vehicles to the Badger already in-game) the UK doesn’t really have a singular LT line per-say. Or was that just more of a figure of speech? In any case I hope you have a good day, and I’m excited to see what else comes! Ik it’s unlikely by my heart is holding out for an FV101/FV601

1 Like