You are not hitting anything with the VT-1 past 7-6 kilometers if the target is maneuvering, both are almost equal in that regard, the only tragedy here is the lack of a tracer on the MIM-146.
And the 50G pull is for the first 3 seconds of the motor burning, it drops to like 20g past 5km and 12g past 8km.
i doubt SLAMRAAM is coming soon, probably winter event
they need to fix alot of old spaa regardless, new spaa doesnt mean old spaa getting neglected
Eh… I dont know. I dont think it would be off by that much tbh. Maybe 2x but more because USAF and USN. But Britain made a lot too. If nothing else, there is certainly no need for some nations to go 2-3 updates with no aircraft and the US to get 4 or 5 aircraft over the same period of time because “they made mroe stuff”
Heck, if we applied that to naval. The UK would get 2 new ships every single major update
i actually CAN hit manuvering target at 6-7km with the MIM-146
thats if they dont sling kh-38mt at me
Gaijin is actually capable to neglect big time
So Britain cant get the Fairey Barracuda at BR 2.0 because we have the Typhoon at 14.0?
Thats a pretty weak arugment tbh,
And the US has the F-15C, F-15E, F-16C and F-18C. What more could they possibly want for Top tier. Whislt im still waiting for the Typhoon to get its placeholder radar replaced
Or Sea Hornet N.F.21 my beloved
that does not change the VT-1 is better, the fact is germany shouldn’t be the only 40km SAM but here we are a far better option would have been to give everyone their SAMs that get to 20-25km to test these new features and then push the limit with a 40km SAM which most nations also have options for but instead gaijin has decide to jump straight to 40km which is a terrible idea
exactly which is why im pissed, they add new spaa so they dont have to care about older spaa, because “grind new spaa so u dont have to deal with old spaa”
@quartas121 & @PyroAddict as for an apology I may not offer my hand as I may not get it back, but sorry for that harsh tease
I mean, is it not true that U.S just made more airframe options that can be implemented to the game?
In the same timeframe U.S made the F-14, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22 and F-35 airframes, U.K made… Tornado, Harrier and Eurofighter.
Yeah I’m not against other nations getting their real equipment
And 2 ships an update for UK is not a bad thing imo
also Boulton Paul Defiant and spiteful
Yeah, a really solid WW2 era (or at least something that would be BR7.0 or below in naval) alongside Vanguard as a decent Naval CAS would be perfect. Its why Id be quite happy with the Mosqutio with the 4k lb Cookie
theres 8 variants. theres as many hawker hunter marks.
if we go off of marks and variations of aircraft that can be added America wont be that much further ahead than British and french aerospace offerings
And several other bombers like the Avro Manchester
ADATS has a 1.10 KDR and Flakrad has a 1.31 KDR against AIR TARGETS. It literally gives you the separate air and ground kills in your charts, but you were too lazy to even do the math on that so picked the total KDR which included ground targets.
what 900 billion dollars does to a mf
Lol true, my most sweaty kill with the VT-1 was a 10 km kill on a harrier, I basically lead the missile to where I believe they would be and splash them, but anything supersonic that’s pulling or diving is not going to work 50% of the time.
i have to use brain to calculate trajectory of my missiles
i can kill most of the time BUT i always have to give up and run because they sling 38mt at me and i cant lock or intercept it