Badger and maybe some fixes and I would be happy tbf
yes those are double standards aswell, if they added F-2 with HMD it would be double standard as much as i would like it to have HMD im not a fan of double standards, they have used it before to mess with other vehicles aswell
I just want CAMM that could be our only addition and I would be happy
Sadly, yes.
Which is entirely subjective where those lines get drawn. If they aren’t going to use them to this point, why should they in the future.
tbf gaijin have also stated that they are on specific test planes its why the EFT doesn’t get PIRATE I think they said another reason to make a difference between the Italian and German EFTs
yeah it is a “unique feature” to not have the IRST
What exactly is the double standard here?
Did they actually test the HMD it was supposed to have, apparently it was fake?
atm there isnt a reason to have the IRST as we dont have long range IR missiles and it cant guide AMRAAMs
also that is one of the big differences between UK and Italian EFTs to Germans they never actually adopted PIRATE
Good news for the F-2A
Yeah ik agree, I’d rather get JASSM on US strike eagles
The JASSM is never going to be added to warthunder🤷
like what ron said up there, put stuff that was only tested on some and not in others HMD/IRST and etc etc, its what im going about, i feel that this kind of stuff shouldnt be added cuz it was tested once on some random spot, maybe if it was tested more than once and put tought into actually adding in service but that also would be a stretch
I mean I think we will same for Storm Shadow and Torus
now the only thing missing is the super etendard with exocets and some british ships around the map and we can do the funny
yeah missing Type 21s and Type 42s with their own Exocets lol
That would be next to useless in GRB, you already have munitions that cover half the map in sim as well, these Long range munitions will 100% be used either against static AA emplacements or targets, or even better, ships.