The HMD is adopted into service just only on Rafale F4
yeah for some reason they got a doc wich was not even primary source about supossedly being able to do this
i think A6E SWIP is done but they still dont know how to release it since it has 9Ms irl
A6E SWIP model isnt very different from the TRAM one
You asked about the Us specifically. Also, you should lay of the passive aggression, you seem a bit over invested.
Ahh ok. I knew it was for the F4 and it was ordered in 2021. However wasn’t sure if it was in use yet
1 Like
And you still haven’t answered the question, why the double standard.
That tends to happen when dealing with people that are full of it
yea misread your comment, mb
Because you didn’t even ask about other nations, so why do think to know my opinion on other nations? (And don’t think I didn’t see you edit out that insult)
Wdym by they normally wont do in any condition? It should be noted that Gripen A, Yak-141, and Mirage 2000-5F all have HMD due to having “tested” it. This is a standard that Gaijin has set prior to Rafale’s introduction into the game. Further, Rafale’s have been tested for multiple HMDs throughout the years.
The lack of leaks regarding an italian, UK and US SPAA are starting to worry me. I don’t even play those trees, but that’s beating a dead horse at this point
Well it’s pretty simple. Do you support the Swiss F-18s getting A2G ordnance they never did, or the EFs all sharing ordnance amongst each other.
And I only did because the forum is soft and it was going to have to get changed at some point anyway.
Yes, it’s currently in use and there’s pictures now which has been used for bug reports.
Just remembered that German lines need a rework if Swish aircraft are really coming:
I would personally drop G.91R3 to Rank V like other G.91s and insert Hunter F.6 or FGA.9 copy paste after the alpha jet
Like also WW2 stuff?
No, I prefer if all the aircraft were accurate to their real loadouts.
Also no, tho I’m not sure it’d change much currently? Only difference I can think of rn are the PW-4s being exclusive to Britain (assuming the other nations never tested them for themselves)
But that’s not the standard Gaijin uses (sadly), so I’m arguing for some lines to be drawn somewhere, to give at least some uniqueness to different nations
2 Likes
Well they can fit under the European/Tornado line but Swiss light aircraft and German heavy fighter would not go along well.
Which returns us back to the question why tf we are getting Swiss Hunters and Hornets
Badger and maybe some fixes and I would be happy tbf
yes those are double standards aswell, if they added F-2 with HMD it would be double standard as much as i would like it to have HMD im not a fan of double standards, they have used it before to mess with other vehicles aswell
I just want CAMM that could be our only addition and I would be happy
Sadly, yes.
Which is entirely subjective where those lines get drawn. If they aren’t going to use them to this point, why should they in the future.