wait a second… it was hidden for me tf?
I have no idea if the channel is only accesible for specific people.
I remember there being problems before
I can see it now but it was hidden for me until I went to browse channels and clicked its checkbox so that it would show up
So, the Tech support from 2 User, ~5 minutes of work…
Makes 2x 4.99€, you can pay Via Visa, Paypal or Golden Eagle, we also Accept Organs (No Change)
:))))))
Zusammenfassung
/s
All pre-production Challenger 3’s have uparmoured UFPs built in
The UFP is significantly thicker
The “Challenger 3” we have ingame is not a Challenger 3, it is the 2019 Challenger 2 LEP with a new name. it has essentially none of the Challenger 3’s upgrades apart from the optics and gun.
5 Likes
There is no vehicle named 630 or Type 630 in Chinese Ground forces, Type 630 is naval gun copy of Ak-630.
So it might be just Type 625E with 6x30mm rotary cannon
Britain still dosen’t have the Vickers MK.7/2 (an upgraded Vickers MK.7 with a better turret)
Also the Vickers MK.4
And the MBT80 (which wasn’t totally finished) but was almost complete before it was cancelled.
Theres also the early version of the Challenger 2E from the Greek trials which has 1500hp
All of those tanks have pretty good mobility, but wouldn’t really be top tier.
4 Likes
Yo, that’s what I was confused about. Typing « 630 SPAA » on Google did not give me any results. I saw the 625/625E that looked more like the teased vehicle and gzsabi’s picture. However I have noticed that the hulls were different depending on the picture, and the turrets (especially the missiles) were also different, but all of them were about the 625/625E. So I’m not too sure as to what variant is considered for the update
I’m on the fence.
Vanguard is a cool ship and I have a minor personal connection with the ship but KGV would add something truly unique for our top tier line up and it’s a shame they are accelerating top tier rapidly without adding all they could first.
But Vanguard is still better than more WW1 dreadnoughts.
I just hope it’s allowed HEVT, all our 7.0 BBs have thus far not been allowed
1 Like
Gaijin is gaijin, they can even add just variant with manpads that will be slightly better than PGZ-04A that already in tech tree. China for now only needs 12.0 spaa. Gaijin in their “sneak peek” said “…more advanced SAM vehicles”. Chinese lav-ad doesn’t looks too advanced bruh
2 Likes
San Shikidan Shells for Japan!!!
it must be the vehicle with the 30mm cannon, the missiles will only be for the FB-10A（next major upate）
3 Likes
Why wouldn’t it be the one with 17km missiles ?
1 Like
Random thought: people have been trying to figure out what they meant by “superior, iconic, big, vast and yottabyte” ships in this update, and that it meant Iowa-Bismarck-Vanguard-Yamato all coming in June.
That is one possibility, as BVVD said they would be closing off the battleship lines in 2025. There is, of course another possibility for S-I-B-V-Y of course that people might not want to rule out yet:
3 Likes
Vanguard was on the “good”, leak list
Yeah i remember was a typo
Tyoe 625 was meaned but not the E version.
From other leakers u are only getting the manpad verdion
Thats what other leakers are saying as i unserstood ig
From what I heard, we might not be getting the FB-10 version, might be the same HN-6 missile on the PGZ04A
1 Like
The iris-t arent realy what was wanted or needed either. It gets a max range of 10-12km.
Everyones complaing about pantsirs range and sonon and gsjins solution is to add stuff that wasnt wanted