Yeah, Sweden has a few in the TT right now.
Smin said that they don’t know if its relevant to add the Dutch versions to the French TT.
1 Like
they are working on it. We wont know what they have in mind until they give us more details
could work in a RTS style behavior where you tell the launcher where to go by clicking on the ground. idk tho
3 Likes
The radar is separate, yes
2 Likes
You really want Gaijin to focus more on Thai vehicles than on Japanese vehicles inside the Japanese tech tree?
I think if they are doing like this, we would probally be controlling the Radar/command vehicle while the Launcher is an AI. Cus if the radar/command vehicle is destroyed, the launcher is useless, no?
1 Like
yes you would probably control the FC vehicle since that is the one that locks and aims. I really hope its not AI controlled tho. Too many things that could go wrong.
1 Like
Or by switching between the two. Like scout drones work currently.
4 Likes
Yeah. But if you lose the drone( aka launcher) you also become useless… so idk
3 Likes
Was thinking this as well, seems like a logical solution tbh. If either dies you’ll pretty much have to commit suicide with the remaining vehicle though
1 Like
also a possibility. with the code they already have maybe even the most likely one
1 Like
more likely to be the british Skysabre system as its only 25km for standard CAMM
Would be nice if you launcer dies, you could still use a datalink to pass targets to other players. So you literally become a radar bait while the other players with intact launchers dont need to use their radars
2 Likes
Yeah no, gaijin is to lazy to do something like that, although it would’ve been interesting.
1 Like
Sorta kinda a scout against air targets then, could be useful if they could mark then on the map or UI for others
Actually, i though of something like “laser buddy” logic applied but i too doubt that Gaijin would do that
if they put all these huge SPAAs into play now they wouldn’t be usable because you would see them from your SPAA since they are as big as a condominium
Yeah lol. Like how would we fit a patriot battery in Cologne map? XD
It would be rediculous to not get the Dutch versions. That was the actual first version to see combat, and the country of origin.
It would be the same as adding the Sherman to every nation, except for the US…
But yeah, it’s Gaijin we’re talking about…
2 Likes
Don’t forget that it should have W6 LEX, same as the F-5T even if Gaijin somehow managed to forget them on the one we have in game. So both of them should be more agile than the regular F-5E
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aYMvX9PgOrFz
2 Likes
Yes, yes, of course. Actually, more than a prediction, its an interpretation I made of gszabis leak, plus the background we have on how Gaijin adds premium vehicles lately.
The ship you mention is also a candidate. But the one that appears in the leak and meets that requirement is the Gneisenau (and it will also sell much better than the Bayern class)
I understand your point and agree with you. But I was referring to what could be, not what should be.
The problem has a spiral or loop shape. Decompress BR would make the MM even worse, with more waiting time due to the lack of players. But at the same time, the lack of players is the fault of BR compression.
Today Naval is a game of farmers, who chase bots with the IQ level of a Neanderthal. Too bad, because it’s a good game mode. The developer’s approach is flawed.
1 Like