He’s waisting his time and the mods time by @ them.
There’s such a thing as MICA VL in real life. I still fail to see how thrust vectoring isn’t thrust vectoring. Are you implying IRIS-T would get a completely different thrust vectoring configuration? Not sure what you’re saying.
2 Likes
Yes in that configuration.
not strapped to a rafale, and a ground launched one 100% has different programming
all tvc missile shares similar flight control codes, what they said is a problem since sraam added to game, and R-73/MICA also has the problem, when fired in low speed and large off axis angle, the flight control may go mad
1 Like
MICA VL, = vertical launch made for it
MICA AA air to air not made for VL
1 Like
Except it doesn’t……
Straight from MBDA, they said they are the exact same missiles. Nothing different in terms of guidance, seeker, or whatever else you’re speculating.
5 Likes
Well, no. The missile is identical. MICA VL is the name of the launcher.
4 Likes
On the outside yeah
1 Like
I shall be taking that.
4 Likes
Did you read the part which says “based on the proven mica A2A” So it’s literally not the same
How can it get worse? The abomination of my eyes.
1 Like
Also by the way, R-73 has also seen vertical launch situations where the exact same air to air R-73 are mounted on ground platforms for air defense situations, yet in-game they still spin out.
1 Like
Because the one in game are made to be launched in an A2A configuration.
Are you aware that missiles have electronics and are programed for its specific purpose
1 Like
I really hope the upcoming devblog is going to be something we dont know is going to be added.
Do you have sources that contradict the MBDA website?