It’s called CAP. And it should be cheaper to spawn
ITO90M is better. Missile speed. HQ17 has in theory 15km but it’s the same as TOR, it just doesn’t self destruct after 12km but 15km.
“That’s this one wrapped! You’ll be able to research the EldE 98 in the next major update when it’s added to the game. See you there and don’t forget to keep an eye on the news for more dev blogs coming your way!”
So one more today?
or they could add the longer range nato SAMs that exist so russia and china arent the only ones with SPAA above 12km
sure hope so!!
Worst Radar for CAP
Worst payload for CAS…
Gaijin…you have done it again!
it’s the multi vehicle system they promised.
clearly not ready now
My prediction is boatblog
This, this is a serious issue.
When does only REDFOR nations get long range SPAA?
Bias, just, pure bias
not surprised, I cant wait to see the gimped state of air launched IRIS-T and ASRAAM lmao
Sweden is mostly on RU’s team so that’s probably the point.
I hope the IJN Yamato
No, matchmaking has never been a factor of adding vehicles.
Well here is to hope germany gets the norwegian nasaams
Personaly i prefer that one either way.
And no norwegian is not a swedish sub tree
Worst radar? OH GOD NATO mains haven’t suffered a single time due to radar have u. Try N001, the radar with no search field change, slower scan rates and near no chance to lock. And yet a plane with that sits at 12.7.
Worst payload, u know there is a plane at 12.7 with none right?
Differences in doctrine.
Nato doesn’t really have that many SPAA’s which are equal to the pantsir.
They’re all either worse or wayy better
looks at clearly Norwegian Leopard 1A5NO2 in the Swedish tree
Peeps attack the UK for “claiming the world”, meanwhile German mains be like…
And Vidar
And the Norwegian f-5
Give it a rest, The Radar on the Su-33 is more reliable than the Captor on the Typhoon.
I have never had to switch through 3 different modes to lock something in the Su-33 but I have with Captor.
Both are bad Radars the difference is one should be really good.