or they could add the longer range nato SAMs that exist so russia and china arent the only ones with SPAA above 12km
1 Like
sure hope so!!
Worst Radar for CAP
Worst payload for CAS…
Gaijin…you have done it again!
2 Likes
it’s the multi vehicle system they promised.
clearly not ready now
My prediction is boatblog
This, this is a serious issue.
When does only REDFOR nations get long range SPAA?
Bias, just, pure bias
not surprised, I cant wait to see the gimped state of air launched IRIS-T and ASRAAM lmao
Sweden is mostly on RU’s team so that’s probably the point.
1 Like
I hope the IJN Yamato
No, matchmaking has never been a factor of adding vehicles.
Well here is to hope germany gets the norwegian nasaams
Personaly i prefer that one either way.
And no norwegian is not a swedish sub tree
Worst radar? OH GOD NATO mains haven’t suffered a single time due to radar have u. Try N001, the radar with no search field change, slower scan rates and near no chance to lock. And yet a plane with that sits at 12.7.
Worst payload, u know there is a plane at 12.7 with none right?
1 Like
Differences in doctrine.
Nato doesn’t really have that many SPAA’s which are equal to the pantsir.
They’re all either worse or wayy better
looks at clearly Norwegian Leopard 1A5NO2 in the Swedish tree
Peeps attack the UK for “claiming the world”, meanwhile German mains be like…
2 Likes
And Vidar
1 Like
And the Norwegian f-5
1 Like
Give it a rest, The Radar on the Su-33 is more reliable than the Captor on the Typhoon.
I have never had to switch through 3 different modes to lock something in the Su-33 but I have with Captor.
Both are bad Radars the difference is one should be really good.
1 Like
It’s one of those things that are like we know it’s a subtree but not confirmed. Like Pakistan to China.
1 Like
Pretty sure its already been well stated we wont see aircraft mounted IRIS-T for a good while thanks to their extreme performance compared to current air to air systems