well they’re still 9Lis
and 11.3 is a BR where Regular 9Ls aren’t to be found on any semi competitive airframe, even the other 2 F5s there don’t get that
You seem to be confused, there are only 2 F-5s at 11.3 and they both get Python 3s, and given that the F-5s are the only fighter aircraft to get such good IR missile at that BR speaks to how poor an airframe the F-5 is, and those like I said are F-5Es with about 50% more thrust, radars, and improved RWR, as well as either extra missiles or HMS. Given that, I’d still say with only 2 missiles the F-5A(G) belongs at 11.3
Both get Python 3s.
1 Like
cheers, missed that
I reckon it’ll be 11.7, however the flight performance may bring it down to 11.3.
Honestly, I expect the same, 11.7 with 2 missiles and 12.0 with 4, but that flight performance is going to be so poor compared to everything else at the BR. I just hope they do something fun with the Penguin, it’s supposed to be sea skimming and the version they’re adding should have a radar altimeter so it should in theory be ground hugging, which could be really interesting for countering SPAA
The Penguin is the main reason I’m interested in it, so hopefully it has all of its features.
1 Like
Terminator is one of those things that i want just for meme reasons. In any case, i feel like the concept of a heavy infantry support vehicle is sound given the nore distributed way tanks are being used now.
Thank you, i also Agree that the Event Star should be reworked =)
3 Likes
Yeah, i think if they made it cheaper, more people would buy it and thus making them more profit in the long run.
Its basically a win-win for both parties in the end.
1 Like
And yet the sub tree rework hasn’t passed considering the amount of support it has
5 Likes
Not passed even with staff have seen it with almost 500 and even more focus on sub trees this year.
Plus the current sub tree implementation as shown it hurts nations more than it helps them.
But yet this barley got 50 votes not even enough to full a pub and it get’s passed
4 Likes
The good part though is that the topic stays open for ideas for improvements so that once it is passed it can be the best possible version!
It’s a nice suggestion though, I’ve always wondered why it wasn’t more like this in the first place. The price dercreasing proportionally to the work put in seems like a good change.
5 Likes
Yes this is another area i’m 100% behind, it should be something done as a priority, ive supported it and Voice my opinion as well
3 Likes
Yeah but it is frustrating since it will be two years in a row now where they will be adding subs to nations.
Such as China, Israel ect. As I said we’ve seen the harm they can do with the British light tanks and IFV’s
and in the case of India division and forum fighting. India could literally work as a tab within Britain same with Thailand air people can choose to play it or ignore it and won’t harm the nation at all. but yea it’s just frustrating
2 Likes
Give me some copium please.
I could be completely wrong, but I have a faint memory from the old forum of a suggestion mod mentioning that they more or less get a “list” from gaijin with what kinds of vehicles they want to get passed from each nation each month based on what they believe different nations or the game in general needs. SPAA, MBTs, WW2, Modern, certain gameplay changes etc. as a form of gathering player feedback before it gets added for real.
I always thoughtbthey just picked things they were already working on
When did Thailand air passed ?
I didnt say i was right thats just what i thought