loads of rules you cant actually find until you ask mods about it, they are so picky that for vehicles with little info (that isn’t in farsi) its too much hassle for me to redo them
1 Like
I havent done suggestions in ages since it takes 3 months to find out if they accept or not.
that in fairness somewhat matches up with what we have in game i think, you try doing in a M1A1 with 3bm42 at 400m (3bm42 is physically the best round they couldve had but it may have been a worse round)
The lack of info really does not help test this properly
But from Prot analysis it seems to bounce in a large amount of places, non pen in other but there is still a decent chunk where it can pen
1 Like
I had one suggestion which was to all the rules which I was able to actually find out get left for weeks only to be thrown out
1 Like
I might work on a saudi subtree soon tho.
1 Like
If i can find more info on the supposed chinese effort to buy a delaware class dreadnought ill suggest that too.
1 Like
trip, travel. being in nature, going around, is the best thing a human can do, best using of time of any human, do it, enjoy it
of course beware of animals that location seems to have bears lol becareful
1 Like
300 replies in one night. Did we get any new leaks?
1 Like
No, just off topic shenaniblins
5 Likes
eh no Immediate 11.7-12.3
and no this thing actually doesn’t look bad at all
it gets 9Li-1s
Ah the 9.7 combat Vehicle that’s so good not even the Russians are using them anymore
4 Likes
It’ll be on par with the Jaguar IS, maybe slightly better, honestly maybe worse, but it probably shouldn’t be any higher than 11.7
o.O weaponry will be on par yes
just the airframe is in an entitely diffrent League than the Jaguar
remember this is an F5 based aircraft, a Nimble light fighter although slower than the competition
the Jaguar is Literally a flying Brick made for bombing… that’s also slower than the competition
I think you’re underestimating just how big a difference there is between this and other aircraft at 12.0+
compare it to the Mirage F1 for example at 12.0, the F-5A(G) has 42% as much thrust, far fewer CMs, no radar, and a much worse RWR.
The F-5A has enough thrust to keep it high subsonic so long as it doesn’t turn too much, which is good at 10.7, but at 12.0 that just isn’t enough, if it does get 4 AIM-9L/I then 12.0 is as high as it should be really, it loses in every metric besides the missiles because of just how dated the airframe is
it has good protection but its slow
the same applies to the Jaguar IS, Just the Jaguar is has worse energy retention and Manouverability
thr F5T-SCU and F5E-OCU with AiM-9P4 and Python 3 are both 11.3 and so is the Jaguar IS with Magic 2
the F5A(G) has to be a Higher BR now because it gets AiM-9Li-1s which (should) have a Better IRCCM than AiM-9M
the count is unknown until the Blog for it comes out but 4 definitely are possible
these missilea at 11.7 on a Fighter would be a Previously untold Powercreep
at 12.0 we’re talking Phantom FG.1 and F-104S.ASA
11.7 is MiG-23MLD territory
I doubt the turret is well armoured
1 Like
They both have quite a bit more thrust, as well as a radar and better RWR, one has 4 missiles while the other has HMS.
So, I stand by the fact that if it only gets 2 missiles it should be 11.3 and if it gets 4 then 11.7 would be best, though I would expect 12.0 in that case.
Also, they’re just AIM-9L/Is not L/I-1, it was a typo on the post that has been corrected now
There’s no difference between the AIM-9L/I and AIM-9L/I-1 in game, anyway, so it wouldn’t matter.