Nothing about the J-11B would be crappy and as far as I know, the J-10B doesnt get a PESA yet. The J-11BG could of course already be added too but it would still get the same missiles as the J-11B would get for balancing reasons most likely
Im 99% sure there is and also if not u can add the spyder with only thos missiles and when there is need u can add the p5 and derby er
I’d rather have a modern flanker with an ESA to keep up with rafale, than a flanker with an M-scan that’s just about as good as the F-15C
J-10B gets PESA from production, J-10C gets AESA and J-10A has M-scan
as long as it has PL-12s and PL-8Bs then it’d be just fine
1 Like
The scan rate is 90° degrees at best at worst is 70° degrees
1 Like
Leak when?
Spoiler
5 Likes
Oh yeah, I just checked again it’s 80 degrees/per second. I confused my terminations and thought the scan rate was a digital thing.
Similar to what happened to the 122s, 2A7s and PSO’s UFP.
1 Like
Those were never service aircraft though, and neither has the full planned capability, the Yak-141 was planned to used R-77 and the AJ-16 was advertised with 8 missile pylons
1 Like
The F-14D did undergo AIM-120 testing on pylons 1B and 8B, with documented photos and reports. While it never reached operational service with the missile, it was more than just a ‘what-if’ concept like the Yak-141’s R-77 capability or the F-16AJ’s loadout.
Isnt it a training aircraft?
I dont think it will be added for israel
it can carry more armament than some of the israeli fighter jets
is its radar and tws not better?
Yes however as a service aircraft the rules are stricter on what it can receive, most everything about the 141 and AJ is made up, the F-14D isn’t the same.
The F-14D also already has plenty of upgrades over the B, the AMRAAM is not necessary
4 Likes
I would agree if the Aim-54C was performing as it should.
1 Like
Tracker is hard to tell, as i lack data on ITO. Search radar will have 5km less range (compared to 30km historical of ITO), but will reach higer (most likely, i lack data on elevation of ITO radar) and it does have TWS for 100 targets, compared to 8 of ITO.
Are those Brimstones?
not sure which model they are but yes that’s the brimstone tri-launcher
1 Like
Damn, depending on the BR, that could be nasty for CAS
1 Like