And what exactly is so problematic about the Typhoon not being as strong as the F-15E or Su-34 as CAS?
maybe read the message I responded to before responding to me?
did I say it’s a problem?
Problem is the Brimstones bring you closer to the SAMs. Yes you can snipe a SAM popping up or turning the laser on but you are literally in range of every other SAM in the spawn.
I die more to a respawned Strela or a Type 81C than a Pantsir in the Typhoon.
Then we don’t need a Hornet, do we? We have the Tornado and the Harrier and that is plenty.
3 Likes
Or a Rafale
A Pantsir will be able to destroy your Mavericks just as easily as your PGMs. You can also launch the PGMs from outside a Pantsirs range, if one is up on the enemy team.
nobody needs the Hornet by that flawed logic.
IF we limited vehicles to only “necessary” additions, then we could easily remove half the vehicles in the game. I simply listed a potential (and likely) addition to these nations, and the benefits they’d provide to said nation. Idk why you felt the need to make such a big deal of it.
2 Likes
Britain doesn’t need the Hornet, Britain has no subtree that operates the Hornet, therefore Britain should not get the Hornet.
1 Like
Christ not this again
1 Like
Britain doesn’t need the hornet
Britain has gotten vehicles from nations that operate the hornet, even if they’re not considered sub trees
Britain is therefore eligible for the hornet
That is my entire point. They CAN get it, and I am stating what it provides them.
2 Likes
Tried out this funny thing where I lower my reading comprehension to a similar level as the in game skill of the poster of said message.
typical renzo nothingburger comment. Either say something meaningful or go troll someone else.
Idk maybe australian version
Clasic armamment for now
Telling people they are mid at best at the game isn’t trolling lol, although I will admit it’s fun to do.
1 Like
True, but with a maneuverable cas you have the option to pull up close to the pantsir and give him a surprise. Although its not the case for harrier, firing pgm makes you a slow target (imagine being subsonic in a tornado in high air)
I mean if you want to hit a pantsir outside its range using a pgm, that would require insane amount of height and is basically impracticable
1 Like
but yes before the incredibly pointless and stupid detour.
Sweden, Germany, USA, Britain are the likely candidates for the F/A-18
Of those nations
Sweden - Benefits because their CAS options are just, mid at best for their BR
Germany/Britain - They either lack a top tier FNF Jet Fighter or their options are worse than the competition
USA - It might replace the F-16C, maybe.
Air RB wise it’s pretty much pointless unless they give it 120Cs and dont give them to any of the existing platforms that could operate it.
(15E, Typhoons, and Rafale were added too early imo)
1 Like
Can we please not go into this for a 4th day in a row
1 Like
Hmm yes bein able to carry 18 Brimstones with 6 to 10 A2A missiles with less spawn cost is really lacking…
1 Like
You don’t get it, they absolutely NEED FnF AGMs on a Fighter apparently