Would be so funny if the hint was for WW2 hornets instead of the F/A-18
8 Likes
Yeah but would those cause a buzz? I think more people care about the F/A-18 tbf.
Screw the F/A-18, we need more WW2 and Cold War content
6 Likes
People flame baiting lol
Buzz of the propellers cutting through the air.
3 Likes
The right kind of buzz
Buzz of the propellers that generate no radar signatures?
I would prefer more late cold war but yes we need older stuff and newer stuff not copy paste.
Ships: as discussed here, MN Strasbourg(gaijin office is located at Karlsculhe)
The tank: the most common takes are Boxer 155, ASLAV-25, BMPT etc, palmaria or centauro 155 as well
1 Like
F/A-18 is cold war, just late cold war, and we probably aren’t getting that version
Actually good point.
@Smin1080p_WT is there any plan to make the blades produce a larger radar signature?
Skyguard on a boxer chassis, its could still be a light tank like the 2S38 and not breaking the no high-tier event AA rule
1 Like
Not the one we will likely be getting ingame
literally what I said
My bad, skimmed over without realizing
Cant wait for another Magach for Israel as thats what they’re totally lacking atm… 🙄
Magach marksman would be welcomed NGL
1 Like
Nothing in the shorter term.
3 Likes
Ok thank you for the insight.
Idk why you got flagged but you post was in bad taste. Just a tip. Most people don’t like it when you just assume you own them which is what your post was essentially saying when you first made it. Again Hägglunds produces and makes the CV90’s. There is no reality where it makes sense to just assume because BAE and britain are close that they should get the Swedish designed and produced CV90’s. Only ones that should ever be given are joint projects with the British military like the CV90 trials where they used the CV90 chassis with a british turret.