Britain has no subtree that uses Hornets.
3 Likes
Technically neither does the US
1 Like
that was hyperbole, you should try it sometime
Nor does the US
1 Like
If a nation isn’t a subtree, the vehicles operated by said nation go to the manufacturers trees by default
r we serious rn?
Yeah but it’s the nation that made it your using fallacies to make your point and that’s making people not want to agreee with you or wanting to compromise
hes saying the US shouldnt get the hornet since we dont have a subtree that uses them…
1 Like
it using asraams is arleady reason enough to count as a event vehicle for the US
because what else are SU24BM, tornado mfg and iranian F-14 besides smal armament differences?
The asraam dont make it an addition to the UK
2 Likes
we wouldnt be having these discussions every other day if yall bothered to play more than one tt, just go play US or Sweden UK does not need a Hornet
1 Like
hyperboles dont really work when talking about tt bloat (which is to be expected with the biggest air force and defence industry in the world) and placement of vehicles
So answer me this, why would one need 2 of the same plane which is what he wants, if they are so similar why give both to one tree, and why cause such a fuss over it, it seems a bit hypocritical to say one nation wants everything then also try to claim everything themselves, but ig that only goes 1 way by his logic
4 Likes
Best thing to do would’ve been to not add india so UK could get at least 1 other nation. Aside from Benelux being really just 2 nations that formed 1 line. With how many vehicles CAN and AU iffer that would be a lot better than something like Benelux and imo rn the UK doesn’t need them
We probably would still have these discussions, because some people can’t accept the fact that their favourite nation isn’t its own tree or a subtree
just saying happend multiple times already, it being so similar doesnt make it so it wont be added to the US
it only makes it the perfect event
1 Like
But what if i want to have a vehicle on every tree. Like the sherman? Lol i only haven’t played 2 nations so this doesn’t bother me
They don’t need multiple copies of the same vehicles, but having multiple copies available makes creating premium, squadron and event vehicles a hell of a lot easier. Britain doesn’t need the Hornet either, so that’s a moot point.
I mean, why would Britain need the FG.1 and FGR.2 at the same time? Why would Japan need both the F-4EJ and F-4EJ ADTW? Etc.
well, for starters, ASRAAM on the Australian hornet.
for canadian hornet, like i said, hornet shouldnt go to UK due to 0 involvement or connection, so canadian hornet would, like i said before either be:
A) a premium
B) a skin for an F/A-18A premium to make even more money
1 Like
Yeah but im kinda fed up of the constant this for US and its ok but anyone asks for even 1 thing for the UK its to use your own words “claiming the world” hmm i wonder how thats gonna look to those people and how theyd react
1 Like
Screw bloating, Eagles are cool
Gaijin go add the 8 vehicle folder of F-15E derivatives now
4 Likes