Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Tbf, the other option iirc cant turn the turret full 360 and is just worse overall, not to mention its easier to copy and paste a Finnish vehicle who’s model is already made.

Again, iirc the turret couldn’t rotate fully and would just be worse overall, for balance it would make more sense to give them a vehicle they had no help in making. Again i think they shouldve added the more unique option and just given the turret full 360 coverage for balance but C&P is easier.

Isnt this essentially the same reason they gave sweden the King tiger? There was a need for a heavy tank and gaijin could reasonably only give 2 heavy tanks, both Finnish Klimi’s due to there rules about event vehicles that then leaves only the KV-1A, so in place of the event KV-1B they added a Tiger 2(p) at least to me that makes sense. Now i need to hope Smin doesn’t smite me for mentioning Finland and a KV-1 in the same post.

Thisiz Emil erasure >:(

17381971681916648485150271559128

1 Like

RRD stay on topic challenge

Impossible

2 Likes

A sable topic here during the down time? That’s an impossibly.

2 Likes

Not going to happen unless sweden was chosen for the dreams come true event, that is really the only way i see it being added in any real capacity. Realistically i think its more likely to see the AKV 151 eventually come in a future update since it has a better HP/T ratio than the Bkan while also having a more amored chassis thanks to the Kranvagn being its base.

I don’t see what issue can be with the reintroduction of KV-1B into Finnish line, we’ve already had event vehicles later coming as a regular one in another TT. For example this one:

and this:

Creating some “rules” sounds more like an excuse to seize heavy tanks options for that TT behind paywall.

3 Likes

She’s beautiful. I’m also a lover of French aviation

1 Like

Talk to Smin about it, i tried to understand why that vehicle had to be exclusive and his reply was because its on the market and those players come first essentially. Honestly he’ll probably explain it to you but all you need to know is its not going to happen unfortunately, again wouldve been a better vehicle than the 1942 considering its 4.7 and has no lineup and Finland has a 4.0 lineup. Regardless Gaijins stance is that Finland won’t get its vehicles, same with the Hawk.

Again its part of the reason Finland imo was and still is a bad choice, it did decent when the t34 was at 3.7 so you actually had a F2P lineup but moving up to 4.0 kills it, Finland is a subtree that ground wise couldve been more unique and filled real gaps with vehicles sweden just doesn’t have. Unfortunately thats not the case, air is honestly the most redundant thing to ever be created, not a single gap was filled with vehicles sweden didn’t already have proper options with but thats me rambling stuff I’ve said a million times about Finland.

(I need a counter for how many times ive ranted about Finland lol, gotta be over a 100 by now.)

Props why the single events are like 750K for the market since the ones tha don’t have that limit are around 20 to 30 GJN while the said 750K ones are normally 70 odd.

The higher the limit the higher the prize tag

Still, i feel the unique aspect is that its on Germany should be enough. I dont understand why they would continue to lock every single unique vehicle to Finland behind either another nation or through event/premium.

Also TT KV-1B could potentially mean we see it move up to 4.3

2 Likes

Yeah and don’t forget the H-75 too that’s an easy C&P but I do like the idea of events stuff being early access in way.

If you want to play Y now you have to play this nation but if you wait for that Y operator to be a sub or nation then you can play it in it’s proper place later on.

1 Like

I said Hawk lol

Chinese LVT placed in US TT I mentioned above is also on the market. Anyway I think if popular enough suggestion comes from the Finnish/Swedish playerbase, they will think again about its reintroduction.

1 Like

event F-15SG (428th FS) in US, then full RSAF one for Japan?

1 Like



Original Forum post by Smin of which now the plan has changed to never.

As you can see the market players come first, which is why its perfectly fine to bandaid the problem with a heavy tank (kungstiger) nobody asked for, you could search all my posts and you will never see me say it was a good idea, it devalues a unique vehicle from Germany which is not a good idea, if the Kungtiger were very different maybe it wouldve been acceptable but as it is i dont agree with it.

Being able to recycle wagers is the thing I’ve been looking forward to the most. Fortunately, text for it was datamined recently.

1 Like

Well there would be no limitations just a hard copy but yeah something like that. Then no one is really missing out nor anything locked away