I’m sure other people had that thought about other vehicles as well
Sorry bro I know the pain of grinding but if we start building the tech tree according to that we might as well put everything in one line
its based on the F-18 Hornet a fighter wasn’t originally a f/a
We don’t announce “estimated” dates for updates. As mentioned above, they always fall within the same general months / quarters of the year. However never on the same dates outside of simple coincidence (which happens when the game is entering its 13th year).
The update is on scheduled and news is not too far away at all.
No, usually it’s the same day as the first devblog, or maybe a day before
Doesn’t matter when it has been in the past, it still may be different in the future.
well originally there was a F-18 variant and a A-18 variants which were merged during development. The hornet was dual from the beginning of its service.
to be fair though doesnt that mean f14B should go after av8B because it was a multirole optimization
It’s primary role was always fleet air defence.
Multirole capabilities were added to make it more versatile
The F-14 has only ever been in service with the navy
still multi role though
yes and i dont rember airforce using f18
So does the F-22 belong after AV-8B+ because it has a strike capability
no of course but f14b remains an f14, just improved, while the superhornet is quite a different aircraft from the hornet, although based on it. If you wanna take examples like that, the F-15E is an F-15C with air to ground capabilities yet it’s in a different line and doesn’teven require grinding the F-15 at all
by l44100s logic yes
the YF-17 was a program. The F/A-18 was another, based on the YF-17 ok but still another program. You can’t change what the hornet is based on what the cobra was supposed to be…
id say we just put both hornets after F14B and folder them under eachother
so you’re saying the YF-17 was a prototype?
then folder f14B under A and add f14D also raise max br to 16.7