My guy the facts speak for themselves, even the wt wiki says im correct, you said i couldn’t read earlier, at least i know about the concept of reusing ship names
what i stated wasnt wrong either genius, there was in fact a freemantle class in australian service during ww2
Yet is that the one in game, unless its invisible, no
like i said naval dont care, doesnt matter, show me a modern aircraft or ground vehicles outside of a pity F-111C and spaa workaround and we can talk
So naval doesn’t count, because it’s naval. The F-111C doesn’t count because it’s a “pity addition”. SPAAs don’t count, because apparently they’re special.
Anything else that won’t count? Just want to plan ahead.
Or maybe you can just admit you’re wrong, because you said no vehicles at all yet there clearly is
whatever fuels your illusions
My illusions sure look a lot like real life, oh wait
nup thats it, a leopard in Uk, abrams in uk and so on would be pretty clear
OK glad we cleared that up. Anything that didn’t fit your argument had a special set of rules applied to it. Yep, going by your special set of rules, we got nothing.
if you want i got smins quote for the f-111c being a pity addition if you dont believe it
Oh no
Not to pick a side here, but Fremantle was built during WW2 and Terra Nova is from the 50s. In what way is that considered modern?
edit: Nvm I am dumb, that is the Cold war Fremantle
apparantly the australians name multiple ship fremantles , no matter how bad that sounds
As i have already stated freemantle was launched in 1979 so is this an alternate timeline im not familiar with
Did you even click on the link to the Fremantle? Built in the late 1970s, entered service in 1980. When do you think WW2 ended?
There are 2 Freemantle. One is from Ww2, the other is from the 80s.
the other 2s just seem to ignore how thats a thing and how people who dont care about naval (the majority) can mix them up, specialy when the first thing that shows up if you google it is a ww2 variant
Lack of care is no excuse for ignorance.