The CF-188 if added to US TT will probably be a premium or Squadron vehicle so it does hold value for Gaijin to add it there.
USA got given skink because usa mains wouldnt shut the hell up so not getting your argument ngl. Canada and Australia may not be official subtrees but are in exclusion of a couple vehicles for BS reasons exclusive to the tree of which they share a King
SQV would probably be best. But either is fine imo. Could even come as an event.
edit: misread what you put. To the UK for those 3 I meant
For the US, given the number of operators. It seems silly to add the identical CF-18 to the US. Even the Australian one for the ASRAAM makes more sense
1 Like
I thought the AIM-7P2 introduced datalink and the regular AIM-7P was just regular software stuff
Lol ok.
1 Like
Yes that a purely US tech which smashes the point of Australia doesn’t need to be a sub tree to get stuff added to the UK tree.
And iirc Smin did say if a cancelled home project isn’t fit to be added then a Commonwealth addition is suitable
Maybe so
Jaguar IS’ still not correct. Needs better cockpit and RWR.
1 Like
I love how this gap/void apparently only just materialized an hour ago
Not happening
1 Like
Tbf i think the problem isn’t that people want the UK and Canada but the problem is the UK already has negated any reason to grind multiple trees and with Canada and Australia it further more makes more trees redundant to grind. Tell me aside from being a fan of a tree why should i bother grinding someone like Japan, Sweden, Italy? When basically all their tech is on the UK? I think if india and SA hadn’t been added as subtrees it wouldn’t nearly have caused such a fuss in the community.
9M
USA permanently stuck with 30g missile
You aren’t seriously expecting AIM-9X, are you?
Once again. It can all depend on how Gaijin feels the addition would fit. UK had nothing to do with the F-18 contrary to the failed 111K. Saying UK should get the F-18 because they were a part of the UK doesn’t hold weight.
Just didnt really think about it. But we dont have something like the F-15A, Mig-29/Mig-29G or Su-27. Given how much Gaijin loves screwing over the F3 Late and FA2. A better “fighter” at that BR would be nice. Especially for SB
2 Likes
Yes. The same one used by the USMC. Therefore Canada doesn’t need to be added to the USA.
Tornado F3 with better engine maybe?
No proof for an LAV 3 btw. You have boxer and Ajax.
CF-18 adds either a premium to the US, or a skin for a premium F/A-18A+ that can be used to make even more money on top of F/A-18A+. Or it can just not be added.
I disagree with the addition of 111C to UK, but that’s where the line should be drawn. Having Gripen, EFT, Su-30, Rafale is just as bad as having CF-18, Leopard 2, CR2, EFT, F/A-18E (Australian but iirc you also are fine with adding Australian stuff to UK, so just throwing that in there)
Or, it can be a skin for the US one to make more money
fake AIM-9X (tracking suspension) (like brimstone (SAL))
Or they add another one to make even more money.
You must be new here. Its an accepted fact that britain deserves everything.