Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

A small light and painted on false canopy = flavor (figurative) now?

1 Like

It will be a case by case base as Smin said before. Telling me to give you back the swiss hunter then making a poll about hiding vehicles and attaching my name to it shortly after seems a bit of an over reaction.

Oh so like how a select few people here claims that all British players want to claim the world isn’t over reacting ?

1 Like

If you want to take this too the DMs we can. I am certain the mods would be appreciative.

This is just F/A-18C+ (late) copy paste, but worse engines

Doesnt really disprove his point that Canada would generally be a bit more of a copy-paste sub tree though.

It isnt exactly Indias fault that gaijin have picked to copy-paste over their unique vehicles.

You also missed the Vickers Mk1 and Vijayanta, arguably the former should be considered Indian given their involvement in its project overhaul into what it became imo. Without them, arguably wouldnt exist or if it did, in a very different form.

Though yeah, I predict a Indian SU30 this patch too, sadly.

So let me get this straight If Australia isn’t a sub and Britain can’t get their tech, is that your stand point ?

So it’s fine when it’s US top tier being spammed?

I like the way this is going

Its one thing that you can potentially acquire most (but not all) US aircraft by playing other nations.

Its another if you could acquire Britain(and by extension Germany and Italy) (Typhoon), Sweden (Gripen C), France (Rafale) and Soviets (Su-30)

All in a single TT

Australia isn’t a sub-tree Britan isn’t guaranteed their vehicles.


look forward to

5 Likes

Not all no I agree, but most certainly

But the fact still supports that the only other country to have Australian tech is the US with a grand total of 1 out of 14 we have.

Holy loadout

There is no certainly at all. It will purely be based off Gaijin’s decisions. If they are feeling generous to the UK tree they may get it. But there is nothing that makes them have to get it.

Not a confirmed subtree

And where may I ask does this is stated ?

And yet I see ppl defending CF-18 and Australian F/A-18 to UK, when in the end that might as well be a Su-30. If you don’t like the idea of one nation having access to other creator nation top tier when they never used it, then hornets shouldn’t be in UK

1 Like

All the times WT community mangers came out and said Canada and Australia are not sub-trees

We don’t want both we just want one, Australian is the user I want