Hopefully that never comes.
the legacy hornet was a replacement for all the attackers that used to be on aircraft carriers, not the tomcat. its evident in its design too.
the super hornet however, supplemented hornets and replaced F-14, then later replaced hornets fully since they got the F-35C
1 Like
It’s not from anywhere credible from what I can tell.
However it does make some pretty safe guesses that I wouldn’t be surprised to see.
The main things that are weird or missing are
- The lack of top tier SPAA in general (the CCs mentioned that will be the focus of this coming patch in Covert Disclosures #4).
- The inclusion of the Spanish EF-18A+ in the Italian TT when Spain is not a subtree. It’s a possible addition, but I definitely have my doubts about it.
- The inclusion of an Indian Flanker just feels weird to me, but I could be wrong about that not being an option.
A few things we know of due to previously credible leaks:
- F/A-18Cs for the USA, Germany, and Sweden
- A-6E SWIP has been on every leak list for the past 2 years
- The BMPT Terminator would fit the recent CC Covert Disclosures #5 hint with a chassis we already have but with a new weapon system (ie. T-72 hull with Terminator weapon systems).
Overall, if this leak was from gszabbi’s leak server, I would trust it. But this list is not present there, so I doubt its legitimacy.
Why? Not like a norwegian f16 wpuld destroy the game
1 Like
It’s foreign and unnecessary.
Not really have you compared their air tree to everyone else? Its literally the worst tree from 1.0-13.7 lol, a DK/NOR 5th airline is very much warranted
1 Like
Important note - the leaker from gszabbi’s server explicitly tries to change up the format each time they make a list so we know it’s a new list from them. The leaks also appear in their leak server on Discord, and it can be verified there.
1 Like
Not only is that irrelevant, it’s also very much untrue.
I’m going to be upset if the BMP-T ends up as an event vehicle, Gaijin can’t f—ing stand giving Russia TT tanks these days. We’re on a streak of 1 year and 3 months since the last Russian TT tank.
1 Like
Im gonna assume you have no idea what you’re actually talking about and agree to disagree
Irrelevant - We were talking about a Norwegian/Danish F-16, not an entire sub tree.
Untrue - Almost every major base is filled, and the ones that aren’t for the most part can be filled with an indigenous aircraft or one used by Sweden/Finland.
Literally the most untrue thing ive read all day lol. What can be added to fix the CAS gap that brings sweden in par with everyone un the 9.x range? How about the lack of 5.x aircraft? How about a 14.0 since how about actually decent 6.x-7.x fighters? None of those BR’s can be filled by sweden or Finland and CAS is a problem for the entire TT.
1 Like
That is good to know
Yeah nah, mate.
this is what I wonder too, but in different view.
making a bunch new separated spaa is not a easy thing, so unlikely in this patch.
and they need to test the control of separated vehicles.
this makes HQ-7B reasonable, something similar to current top spaa, but separated, as a test, and filling Chinese top spaa gap.
too resonable to be real
You cant even think of a decent response again you don’t know what you’re talking about. Its fine just dont pretend like you know when you literally cant even provide decent solutions lol
Id rather them buff the griffen as its bad enough everyone and there mom has f16
That’s an issue, not an issme.
Id rather see CF104 and F 35 from Norway and Denmark but the damage done to the gripen is essentially set in motion. If gaijin decided that the gripen should’ve been buffed it would’ve been fixed by now. So using that same gaijin logic why fix the problem when i can patch it over with a different aircraft?
because thats just annoying nerf a domestic plane in the ground heres a f16 go have fun
F16=Sherman at this point