Yeah, sometimes even I can’t help it, but believe me, I try my best not to be spammy, hahah.
Otherwise, I would practically bring 2-3 bug reports every day… but I don’t want to be THAT insufferable :P
Specially lately, I have been meaning to bring up the lack of spall liners on Chinese MBTs, which were reported in December 2023 and accepted in March 2024, bu- NO, NOOOO!
I hope so given the concession they made to give the F-15I mavericks, although even deeper in my heart I believe that we’ll get Mavericks and Domestic AGMs on Israeli Jets
Yep at least a 50 years worth of steam right there with most of them being built in the 40s but not the Grange as that was completed last year so it’s the newest steam engine in the whole world iirc or at least Britain
Tbf, the other option iirc cant turn the turret full 360 and is just worse overall, not to mention its easier to copy and paste a Finnish vehicle who’s model is already made.
Again, iirc the turret couldn’t rotate fully and would just be worse overall, for balance it would make more sense to give them a vehicle they had no help in making. Again i think they shouldve added the more unique option and just given the turret full 360 coverage for balance but C&P is easier.
Isnt this essentially the same reason they gave sweden the King tiger? There was a need for a heavy tank and gaijin could reasonably only give 2 heavy tanks, both Finnish Klimi’s due to there rules about event vehicles that then leaves only the KV-1A, so in place of the event KV-1B they added a Tiger 2(p) at least to me that makes sense. Now i need to hope Smin doesn’t smite me for mentioning Finland and a KV-1 in the same post.
Not going to happen unless sweden was chosen for the dreams come true event, that is really the only way i see it being added in any real capacity. Realistically i think its more likely to see the AKV 151 eventually come in a future update since it has a better HP/T ratio than the Bkan while also having a more amored chassis thanks to the Kranvagn being its base.
I don’t see what issue can be with the reintroduction of KV-1B into Finnish line, we’ve already had event vehicles later coming as a regular one in another TT. For example this one:
and this:
Creating some “rules” sounds more like an excuse to seize heavy tanks options for that TT behind paywall.
Talk to Smin about it, i tried to understand why that vehicle had to be exclusive and his reply was because its on the market and those players come first essentially. Honestly he’ll probably explain it to you but all you need to know is its not going to happen unfortunately, again wouldve been a better vehicle than the 1942 considering its 4.7 and has no lineup and Finland has a 4.0 lineup. Regardless Gaijins stance is that Finland won’t get its vehicles, same with the Hawk.
Again its part of the reason Finland imo was and still is a bad choice, it did decent when the t34 was at 3.7 so you actually had a F2P lineup but moving up to 4.0 kills it, Finland is a subtree that ground wise couldve been more unique and filled real gaps with vehicles sweden just doesn’t have. Unfortunately thats not the case, air is honestly the most redundant thing to ever be created, not a single gap was filled with vehicles sweden didn’t already have proper options with but thats me rambling stuff I’ve said a million times about Finland.
(I need a counter for how many times ive ranted about Finland lol, gotta be over a 100 by now.)
Props why the single events are like 750K for the market since the ones tha don’t have that limit are around 20 to 30 GJN while the said 750K ones are normally 70 odd.