Single issue that your operator view point just doesnt exist in wsr thunder outside of official main tree and subtree nations.
You cant add everything and make everyone happy.
1 Like
Your “rules” viewpoint doesn’t exist either, just flexible guidelines that Gaijin bend as they see fit.
However you wana call it i still follow the current modt recent guidelines.
Change them and i will change my attitude toward it as well.
Right, follow the guidelines you like, ignore the ones you don’t, since there are multiple ways things have been done in the game.
1 Like
Not really, thats just how they go
1 Like
rafale is allowed to have a better radar and FM than F-15E at 14.0, so why cant an F-15C which is slower than E (and 13.7) get its proper radar
answered it yourself
But why specifically the Australian one and not just the US AIM. Never made sense to me because the US could get either, but the AIM could have gone a few places
it shouldnt though. abrams is the only unique US production MBT in the whole game
id prefer a US AIM anyways, but due to rounds and armor that wouldve been top BR which isnt allowed for non-tt
1 Like
listen I want an Abrams in a tech tree that isn’t the U.S. for the simplest and pettiest reason imaginable. Because I know that no matter what nation gets it, it’s going to be performing better than the U.S. ones
So the U.S. players cant hide behind the excuse of “but but abrams bad!”
7 Likes
Abrams is a really good tank. Sure I think there’s a few things they should do to it (like removable ARAT II from the SEPv2, armor stuff, etc., as well as hoping the eventual M1A2 SEPv3 is ironed out/good) but it’s got fast reload, pretty good survivability, and it’s quick. Just gotta play it right as with any tank.
Just give it to the most hated nation at top tier
May I ask how this is the case? The jet would not need to move up much if any with the introduction of AIM-9Ls as unlike its american counterparts it does not have HMS, AIM-7Ms, and leading edge slats. The only area that it is not at a disadvantage to the F-4J/S is that it has better engine performance at low altitude. All 3 of the British Phantoms ESPECIALLY the F-4J(UK) are just flat out worse than their American equivalents in every way. The AIM-9L would give it a slightly different purpose compared to the Americans and would give it some advantage in the close range department while the Americans have the must bigger advantage at range.
1 Like
sweden/germany?
Through in some bussian rias for good measure
I wait F-101 Voodoo series for USA & British
But gaijin ready AIM-4 Falcon this year or next year ?
2 Likes
They’ve only mentioned that weapon when they’ve stated it 's not planned to come, so it and any aircraft dependent on it 's addition don’t have any evidence to be coming as things stand currently.
2 Likes
Gaijin might add another domestic USA fighter aircraft rank VI & VII but without AIM-4 ?
So gaijin might ready AIM-4 Falcon 2 years ?
The evidence for AIM-4 and aircraft which require AIM-4 is currently none, so a timeframe cannot be attached.
what about AIM-26A and AIR 2 though?