its an spaa, gajin is way more liberal with spaas, see finish ito 90m in french tree, besides that US has their own ADATS a reason why KF41 as example would go to germany cause they dont have a KF41
that one literaly was added to the UK first and evaluated by UK itself one of the reasons it was added to the UK
officialy stated by Smin, its a replacement for the F-111K project of the UK, it never finished production and couldnt be added thats why gajin was so nice to add it for the UK
original australian vehicles those they went to australia as well / the sentinel has its origins in Uk as well
somebody is forgetting the australian abrams or multiple canadian vehicles in the US tree as well
so yeah you forgot stuff lol the vehicles with roots in other nation (exception the bone gajin threw with F-111) that were imported went to their original nation
The UK does get all domestic Australian and Canadian vehicles though, no? As well as things like ADATS. Whereas the US and Germany only gets those based on its own systems.
And the CL-13 in the German and Italian trees are German and Italian service vehicles, not Canadian, there is no Canadian CL-13 in game
Yeah, some people can’t be reasoned with, but the Commonwealth Hornets are a different story, they did see service and therefore could come to the British tree
And it is clear there is demand for a Hornet in the British tree
The thing is that there’s no consistency, take for example the F-15A & -C (no report, since the -15A one stalled) getting access to the GPU-5/A Gunpod.
Of Which the report i made was “knocked back” due to the image being of one the TF-15A airframe later used to prototype the F-15E, even when other supporting evidence states that it can be carried by the generic “F-15” and that the video states it can be carried on unmodified MAU-12 Bomb racks, which are shared across all F-15 variants.
Or the potential report that I did not proceed with for the A-4E “Early” to get the GPU-2/A, which even though I could prove the unit in question operated the A-4E Early, -E Late and A-4F at the time of the video (and aside from the fact that some A-4E’s were later modified with the Spine Electronics Bay)
Just had a look at it as it isn’t my normal area of interest, why don’t we just add the vehicle that beat it at trials in the AS21? if we have to have an Australian IFV, at least make it unique and actually Australian xD
These are however different airframes. The supporting brochure is also not specific about what F-15 that may be and again could be referring to F-15B.
The F-4F manual is a clear cut specific manual for the F-4F and is demonstrated on F-4F airframes in the US. So these two matters don’t really compare.
And the functional difference in ordnance capacity between the F-15A and F-15B, is? It’s generic because it’s a promotional video / Brochure so could be made to work regardless of what the client had in inventory.
If it was limited in some way, it would be mentioned.
Also is it at all likely that the STINGER reports will be actioned anytime soon, it’s been months (8, since they were accepted) at this point and considering how many nations are stuck with the Current (erroneous) implementation as a top-Tier system?
