Then I guess that the Canadian ADATS, Skink, and F-111C are exceptions to the rule and the placement of the Boomerang and Sentinel are just accidents?
I mean, correct me if I’m wrong, but the only Commonwealth vehicles that have ended up in Germany are the Leopards, right?
It seems to me that Canada and Australia are a subtree of the UK in all but name… and that the exception is actually the Canadian Leopards going to Germany, not the other way around.
soo…
and what we do now? we should report again this smin? because the jets was indeed used with mavericks and its perfectly capable of use them.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ffL1Nek1czgF
here´s the report we made 5 months ago. it was “accepted” but not accepted at all, if you look down in the comments there is a comment from a technical mod (i dont know who it is but i suppect that is someone controversial) that says this:
translation: The Israeli F-16 Barak mavericks have not been and are not wearing. “The photo is an American F-16 still photographed over the territory of the USA in a test flight, on arrival in Israel they all lost the opportunity to wear Mavericks because the Mavericks did not get bought for F-16” but here you said that “weaponry being in a nations operational stockpile is not a requirement”. soo… i dont understand anything lmao am soo confused.
First of all this is not an AMERICAN F-16 is an Israeli F-16 with the serial number 301 same number that have in all his operational life under the IAF soo… its not american is israeli, second is an israeli F-16 conducting test flight over US territory, because it is in US territory doesnt mean that is automatically an american F-16 and it also says very clearly in the book that is the first IAF F-16!!! soo what the hell man?!. please smin if you have an answer to this we are very gratefull and if you can bump this report it would very awesome.
funny thing are but those are exceptions yes
its an spaa, gajin is way more liberal with spaas, see finish ito 90m in french tree, besides that US has their own ADATS a reason why KF41 as example would go to germany cause they dont have a KF41
that one literaly was added to the UK first and evaluated by UK itself one of the reasons it was added to the UK
officialy stated by Smin, its a replacement for the F-111K project of the UK, it never finished production and couldnt be added thats why gajin was so nice to add it for the UK
original australian vehicles those they went to australia as well / the sentinel has its origins in Uk as well
somebody is forgetting the australian abrams or multiple canadian vehicles in the US tree as well
so yeah you forgot stuff lol the vehicles with roots in other nation (exception the bone gajin threw with F-111) that were imported went to their original nation
oh yeah canadian CL-13 in germany
There is no need for a report. This one has already been passed as a suggestion.
The UK does get all domestic Australian and Canadian vehicles though, no? As well as things like ADATS. Whereas the US and Germany only gets those based on its own systems.
And the CL-13 in the German and Italian trees are German and Italian service vehicles, not Canadian, there is no Canadian CL-13 in game
yes , so the KF41 goes to germany, thats the thing i am arguing all the time
I know, the KF41 shouldn’t go to Britain, and can’t because it never saw service, it can only go to Germany
tell that the guys in the kf41 suggestion
Yeah, some people can’t be reasoned with, but the Commonwealth Hornets are a different story, they did see service and therefore could come to the British tree
And it is clear there is demand for a Hornet in the British tree
could yeah, honestly i am just to riled up cause of the other thread currently so i did duck around here as well to make air
its gonna get the mavericks or not because this was 5 months ago and we had 2 majors in the middle.
The thing is that there’s no consistency, take for example the F-15A & -C (no report, since the -15A one stalled) getting access to the GPU-5/A Gunpod.
Of Which the report i made was “knocked back” due to the image being of one the TF-15A airframe later used to prototype the F-15E, even when other supporting evidence states that it can be carried by the generic “F-15” and that the video states it can be carried on unmodified MAU-12 Bomb racks, which are shared across all F-15 variants.
Or the potential report that I did not proceed with for the A-4E “Early” to get the GPU-2/A, which even though I could prove the unit in question operated the A-4E Early, -E Late and A-4F at the time of the video (and aside from the fact that some A-4E’s were later modified with the Spine Electronics Bay)
There are many weaponry suggestion reports open. Some far longer than that. So its not possible to confirm at this time until the report is resolved.
Just had a look at it as it isn’t my normal area of interest, why don’t we just add the vehicle that beat it at trials in the AS21? if we have to have an Australian IFV, at least make it unique and actually Australian xD
These are however different airframes. The supporting brochure is also not specific about what F-15 that may be and again could be referring to F-15B.
The F-4F manual is a clear cut specific manual for the F-4F and is demonstrated on F-4F airframes in the US. So these two matters don’t really compare.
your guess is as good as mine, i suggested it multiple times myself
2 weeks man maybe 3, you can wait that long right?
Not that soon. As I said earlier today.
