The Belgian side would be interesting because they have a slightly more active defense industry but the Dutch army is just the Bundeswehr at this point
There are always conflicts when talking about France, Germany and countries around them. There is also a solution similar to the SK-105 issue: Both France and Germany got SK-105 eventually, but conflicts still lie there.
TBH, for German top-tier players, the thing that worries them most might be that the best leopard2 is not serving in Germany, so they would yell for a sub tree or a seperate vehicle.
Btw, German does need a sub tree for air, the German airforce is just terrible.
One day I will go back and play germany, but at the moment I see no reason to stop playing sweden, italy and britain since IMO they have the most fun and dynamic ground trees
not specifically that, mostly the cry for the leopard 2A7V rn its the lackluster armor wich the devs themselves stated to be an error, a bug that causes the armor to have numerous holes and underperform compared to the STRV122 armor, as for the swiss its just that the light tanks are pretty good to fill lineups and even some ww2 tanks are pretty unique and looks fun to play with
1 Like
Thought they fixed the bug for the rounds bouncing and both leopards have the armor hole below the front plate
they said it should be fixed by this next major update wich i look foward to, but by any means the leopard 2A7V its an extremely good tank, being a jack of all trades with decent mobility, good armor and great gun together with good thermals, but the bug is still there
Still i dont feel like thats warrants being called the worst leopard. When it has quite a few buffs comoared to the 122
i will agree on that specially counting that it has more upsides like the 3rd gen thermals and good pen shell, but the STRV122 survivability its insanely much higher than the leopard 2A7V wich its weird considering the 2A7V its much more modern
Depends on if they are balancing them for the sake of having a difference
as of rn tho im more excited about the introduction of the Boxer for the TT and the PUMA S1, and im very curious on what boxer will it be i really hope its the Skyranger 30 tho
not a balancing factor tho, and it would be a really ridiculous balance tbh as they said before they actually tried to copy paste the strv122 armor values but somehow ended up making it worse due to spagetthi code
A7V is slightly better comparing to 122, IMO. It’s the back-up vehicle that makes difference. This might be solved in the future when A6EX, TVM come.
BTW, this reminds me of the L2PSO, it’s said to be using the A6EX’s hull and also issue is acknowledged, but bug fix never comes.
Also, what is D-Tech? Some are saying that it’s only the Extra Composit Armor, while others think the hull armor is also changed to provide better protection.
1 Like
part truth part fake, it seems to be using the Leopard 2A6 hull but not the 2A6EX the PSO-VT does use the 2A6EX hull
Gaijin are now saying that the aromor value difference is ‘not a bug’, that A7V is better against HEAT and missiles while not so efficient facing kinetic rounds.
There is a saying that Gaijin is using the TVM’s brochure as source for A7V, but who knows.
Any idea what BR the Kv-1 would be at?
5.0, its an armored KV-1 with the cast armor so same armor value as the KV-1B but since the unarmored KV-1 Zis-5 sits at 4.7 the new KV-1 will be 5.0, the same BR as the german version with a better gun
Heres your pen
1 Like
huh, weird, doesnt appear to make a difference tho
Thanks. looks like its in the same penetration struggle boat as the American 75mm tho