While we’re on the topic of Hornets, where do people think the CF-18 would go in Britain?
Personally I’d think either after the Gripen or after the Harrier GR.7.
I’m leaning slightly more towards the Gripen though
1 Like
It won’t go to Britain
What lmao? When was sweden ever meta top tier jet wise before the gripen? What OP jet did they get vs the F16 and Mig 29?
Actually delusional
1 Like
I mean gaijin could, its really up to them.
After we got India as a subtree and were told multiple times that Canadian and Aussie vehicles would go whereever Gaijin thinks they are needed?
Nah.
I mean i cant see gaijin not adding one to britain, seems like another way to add more interest to their tt.
Hence why I said “Most likely the former” lol.
Only real “rules” for this were the Canadian Leopards and the Australian Abrams, the Ram Mk II iirc was Gaijin’s poor excuse of “British ground didn’t really exist”, either way it was Gaijin being dumb but now the other Ram variants have been confirmed to go to Britain if they get added.
We have Canadian and Australian tanks/ships/boats in the British tree, with Australian planes also.
So… It’s fully possible for both Countries to still make an appearance.
As it is a naval plane I’d say their naval fighters line, so line 3.
2 Likes
First of all, people that don’t want to use the actual British aircraft shouldn’t be playing Britain.
And second, why would they add a Canadian Hornet to the tree? It didn’t come when people were asking for it the most. Britain got the SAAF Gripen instead and now it’s also bound to get Indian aircraft.
Lastly, a Hornet isn’t even needed for Britain. Both the fighter and the strike roles are filled and there are enough contenders for further additions without even taking Canada, Australia, etc into consideration.
1 Like
again it properly will the USA don’t need it’s own variants on top of the Canadian and Australian ones.
If a country needs it more it will go there is what I understand from Smin
1 Like
The Ram II was added when the British ground tree already existed.
Gaijins stance on Australia and Canada is that they are support nations and do not have a set home.
I mean, the SA Gripen was added.
So in all honesty it only makes sense.
Look at the whole Swiss F-18 situation going on, I genuinely don’t see why the CF-18 can’t be added then lol.
No I’m not saying “BrItAiN nEeDs ThE wOrLd”
1 Like
“Gaijins stance on Australia and Canada is that they are support nations and do not have a set home.”
Minutes earlier “It won’t go to Britain”
You see what the problem is here ?
3 Likes
And like I had mentioned, Gaijin had some piss poor excuse as always.
Look at the QF 3.7 Ram, it’s still a Ram, soooooo.
Also look at the Skink, Skink “could’ve” been added, but no it wasn’t.
Going off the Ram rule, then the Skink should’ve gone to the US only
1 Like
It’s hard to keep track of the goal posts
3 Likes
The Canadian or Australia Hornets won’t go to Britain as they need them.
But also the US doesn’t need them where the frick do you stand ?
3 Likes
Mate, the only rule is that Canada is not a subtree. Their vehicles can go wherever Gaijin deems fit.
And that seems like Britain rather than the US since they got tons of there own aircraft to add
2 Likes
Im not talking what people want im simply mentioning gaijin. Its very likely it will go to britain because its an available option.
3 Likes