I know if I say the amarican mains are gonna go ape will lol 😂
1 Like
We need a safe space free from the Timmys who want the AIM-9X and AIM-260s to actually discuss the game lmao
1 Like
Wait until they are asking for the F-22 lol
1 Like
But they’ll still use it to bomb bases
5 Likes
As is tradition, yes
5 Likes
I’ma huff a kilo of Copium here and say:
GAIJOOBLES PLEASE GIB KRANVAGN
It can take at least 7 GBU or at least 2 A2G missiles, however it depends on how angry the Chinese community, they do have some evidence to prove that it can take 6 PL12 and 2 pl8, but I think Gaijin will refuse that, you know it is not Sweden vehicles.
It is the way of the American main
Most likely a dreams come true event but its unlikely sweden will be anytime soon. More likely Russia, French, or perhaps US before
Yeah that’s fair. Not that i’d be able to grind the event anyways so yippeee.
Yeah… most days are not that bad for me, maybe 500 - 1,000 posts just in this thread alone…
I pretty much read the equivalent of a 10,000 page book when I log into the Forum every morning ^^
3 Likes
Bro how the forums have been crazy stale for me other than this thread lol
gaijin should pay you for this mental damage
1 Like
Germany could rearrange the 3 trees on the right and combine 2 of them to make some room for a subtree IMO
While they are excited to get leopards? Dude…
They’ve just mocked me days before when I was saying that no leopards for FR
Except he is a Chinese speaker and even his wife is Chinese, so you can’t be claiming bias-bias-bias. Where are you getting your information from?
The CN community now has drawn a conclusion, the evidence exists, but not sufficient.
Due to the fuel limit, early J10 usually carries fuel tank to extend its battle range. The most photos are taken during AirShow where the plane is exhibited on ground.
So though not really acceptable, it is still reasonable for Gaijin to refuse that issue
I apologize if I guess wrong, but the source part contains no source in Chinese. and from this thread, many source claims it’s a very independent design.
i speak chinese as well. and even a bit of the dialect of Hengyang. i own a house there. my wife is Chinese and my son is going to school there.
the only difference is my source of information is not clouded by Bias and propaganda
the information about the Lavi’s information been sold to china was made public in 1994. the US intelligence (and the CIA) was already aware of that. but in order to not tanish the relation with Israel, they let is slid as long they do not comfirm it publically otherwise they would have to cut some healthy supplies to isreal which they didn’t wanted. the F-16 was not considered as a their best plane anymore so they let it go.
it was further confirmed by the many Russian engineer who worked for Lyulka at the installation of the Salyut AL-31FN engine on the J-10A for china in china. they had access to the plane and his blueprint. their knowledge of the various planes comfirm them it was based on the F-16. they qualified the J-10 as a “melting pot” of foreign part and technology (those are their words)
and finally. this is what the plane was looking like before 1987
and this is after 1987
what changed? the plane was entirely redesign and was redraw from scratch… to look exactly like the Lavi. and the main source who state the plane is not related to the Lavi is Song Wencong the head engineer behind the J-10 development
which is this guy posing in front of the Lavi with some of his best engineers.
and if you think he was there for the missiles only. you do not send the head of an ongoing project for a simple thing as to make a missile compatible. you send 2-3 key engineers responsible for the armament and avionic, not the leader of the team. and it’s the Israeli engineer who went to China to help with the compatibility of the missiles on the Chinese system. it’s not like they would solve the problems when the plane is not there. the plane was not even built yet… they would not have gone to Israel for potential compatibility for missiles. that is a rather minor part of the development which is usually a normal upgrade. the only reason to go to Israel was to see things they couldn’t bring to china. wich was in this case, clearly the Lavi.
16 Likes
There are also some political factors, Isreal stopped the improvement of Lavi due to (or maybe due to) the pressure from US. And at that time CN was seeking for normalizing the relationship with US. So there isn’t much chance or motivation for CN to acquire the core documents of Lavi from Isreal since this might be contrary to the policy at that time.
The similarity between Lavi and J-10 does exist, but it remains a mystery whether CN received support from Isreal. And CN media denies the saying of derivation.
So… IMO, in dubio pro reo.