I would be irritated, but there is only one more 13.5" battleship and that is the KGV 1911, they get Marlborough shells and not Orions dogwater shells.
I would just about be able to tolerate that, but also I don’t think KGV 1911 has the same style of deep machinery and internals as Marlborough, which means she will just get nuked like Orion.
They used the exocet files from the game i mean ^^
By close to ingame stats it’s more about i have no idea if ingame stat are close or not to IRL ones, and they can also change over time perhaps (balance and all)
Why do you think Gaijin says India is gonna be a “subtree” for Britain?
It’s still easier for them to add Russian C&P (with a single new radar (example)) than to add actual designs
I think Queen Elizabeth might be a better ship in-game for survivability.
Firstly, their refits didn’t add stupid amounts of armour like the Nagato’s so they could get their best possible AA without being broken, they would all also have access to a minimum of Greenboy shells which beat at least the Bayerns easily, and all the QE’s can use the 6CRH shells which Hood cannot use and yet Hood’s AP is some of the best in-game with 2nd best filler, good penetration and angle of fall.
Secondly they have a slightly thicker belt even when you consider angle of construction its either better or about the same.
Thirdly their ammunition storage appears to all be low in the hull at the bottom of the ship, Mutsu’s frontal ammunition storage is quite low but the rear is relatively high and easier to hit. Whereas this original Drawing of Barham shows that the ammunition storage is all one level, and all below the waterline.
Mutsu’s 25 second reload and very high penetration shells are scary though.
Everyone is food for Scharnhorst.
But even the French ships at 6.7 are relatively disappointing for 6.7 ships, not even hitting 500mm of penetration or having good armour its closer to the original HMS Dreadnought, the first dreadnought ever. Though much better shells and gun placement than Dreadnought.
I don’t see France being truly competitive until Richelieu I’ll be honest. Unless Lyon comes in which case that changes a lot of things.
But Normandie has relatively low armour thickness, and Dunkerque also, I don’t think angling Dunkerque will save her, Strasbourg maybe will be quite good with some decent angling.
Richelieu should be good though if she comes in a Late/Post-war configuration with improved reload rate.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth has weaker protected magazines than Nagato. But we don’t have Nagato itself. Only Mutsu without modernization. But if they give Nagato 1944, then there is thick armor, especially the ammunition magazines will have armor under 400+ with slopes. And also the Type 91 shell. And also the reload of 410 mm will be 21.5 seconds. Well, there will be a lot of air defense for 44
from what i have seen frigates with ASM seem pretty balanced any kind of high calibre HE absolutely rinses their crew but the ASM can also do a ton of damage even to battleships