A7V is slightly better comparing to 122, IMO. It’s the back-up vehicle that makes difference. This might be solved in the future when A6EX, TVM come.
BTW, this reminds me of the L2PSO, it’s said to be using the A6EX’s hull and also issue is acknowledged, but bug fix never comes.
Also, what is D-Tech? Some are saying that it’s only the Extra Composit Armor, while others think the hull armor is also changed to provide better protection.
Gaijin are now saying that the aromor value difference is ‘not a bug’, that A7V is better against HEAT and missiles while not so efficient facing kinetic rounds.
There is a saying that Gaijin is using the TVM’s brochure as source for A7V, but who knows.
5.0, its an armored KV-1 with the cast armor so same armor value as the KV-1B but since the unarmored KV-1 Zis-5 sits at 4.7 the new KV-1 will be 5.0, the same BR as the german version with a better gun
it’s at 5.0 right? 5.0 Sweden has a relatively decent lineup already.
You have the DT and a TD already, although I get the point that it lacks anything decent for 5.0, so yeah you’re probably right and wait for it to go down in BR or get better penetration.
Wont get better pen, 5.0 has 1 good tank and the other is a meh TD with no use imo. The majority of swedish TD’s are pretty mid but since there is like 7 people who actually play the TT they stay at high BR’s
A.) As I pointed out the Netherlands supply the Top BR MBT.
How many times are you people going to need to be told it’s a Joint Command the Netherlands still has full control over its ground forces and what it buys.
The Skyranger 30 would be best, as it would be the most unique and would add something not already in game, however I’m expecting the PuBo, as it would be much easier to make due to the turret already being in game.