I mean the Gripen could probably do with going up. Just nothing compares to it. It is the master of Close Quarters work, I don’t think most people would dispute that. Yeah the lack of competitive SARHs hurt it but then again Multipathing.
1 Like
This is not correct at all.
It simply means we have a Russian speaking stream focused on the Russian community and an English stream for the international community. It has nothing to do with development resources or allocations.
1 Like
1 Like
Is that the reason why we get soooo many Russian vehicles per update?
Because i haven’t see any other nation getting more then 5-8 indiginous vehicles per update.
Meanwhile the western community has been asking for GB IFV’s, ISR IFV’s, Chinese IFV’s, French IFV’s and better SPAA to counter that blatantly OP SU-25BM3 at the higher br’s of the game, yet we haven’t seen anything, anything.
The only thing we have gotten is a premium French IFV, ONE Chinese IFV, C&P M60’s for ISR and still no long range pantsir equivalant SPAA for NATO nations.
2 Likes
M4K winned fight against Gripen before the release, and i’ve read Gripen have been nerfed since.
Gripen is always the best or M4K can still slap it but just nobody talk about it?
1 Like
Mix of both imo
2 Likes
I mean fine but that does feel very disparate. Why not a Spanish speaking stream for the South Americas/Spain? Why not an… say Arabic speaking speech?
So why not have more streams for more communities, the Esports team manage it…
2 Likes
The Russian forum forbids condemning the work of Gaijin, the topic “to stream more correctly” is likely to be banned
7 Likes
Gripen has definitely been nerfed since. I think that perception is more down to not many people flying the M4K, rather than it being or not being powerful.
1 Like
DOVBLEG
WHEN
13 Likes
Often they are simply reminded of things that they already have documentation for.
The real difference is that BLUFOR reports are often made with 3rd rate non-evidence and speculation.
Soviet reports typically come with Primary source material.
May I remind you that several reports about T-80B/T-80U/T-80UD reload rates have been flagged as actually 6 seconds, but those reports are DENIED because apparentlythe T-64 with 115mm gun has a longer reload… Despite the cyclogram specifying exactly 6 seconds.
There’s no double standard in reality.
Wann vodlbeg?
1 Like
Wonder.
Everybody talk about how Gripen is dah best plane.
I remember Gripen being hard slaped by M4K (in 1v1 turnfight) before the update go lives.
1 Like
I want blovdeg
1 Like
The only thing keeping the Mirage 4000 from truly dominating is its lack of HMD, really.
1 Like
Sure it would become crazy.
Like the idea of it getting 14x Micas xD
1 Like
The entire Challenger 2 debacle.
I mean that might be true, and that is of course perfectly legitimate. However, once again that raises the question of “how do you bug report something you don’t have primary sources for?”
Because Western Security is pretty neat, such that you’re unlikely to get your hands on primary docs.
-
There’s just no evidence Soviet tree gets disproportionate developer time.
-
Soviets get many vehicles because there’s tons of vehicles IRL and tons of primary documents readily available. If you want more vehicles, go get documents declassified.