That would ironically overload the French tree, and with non-French vehicles, no less, and players of different nations shouldn’t fight. All of us (expect Swedish ground and Russian players) are in this cesspool together.
1 Like
Dude just stop trying to bait me into an argument and also it’s a called having a learning difficulty so ya better step back with that one lol
4 Likes
Won’t happen this decade with how things are going, we still have good time to reach that when you see the size of the big 3 x)
France on its own can and should have a tree at least the size of current Sweden, including the Finnish sub tree, and that’s discounting all non-French vehicles that were used by France, so it’s a travesty that it’s in the state that it is.
5 Likes
I just did. It’s European, that should be enough.
I would even say we have the possibility to come close to the big 3 in therm of sheer numbers.
France is in some ways considered a global superpower these days, and is at least one of the most powerful nations in the world, so definitely.
1 Like
Not to me, to potential customer (militaries) in Europe. I don’t have the budget necessary to buy a KHT :"D
1 Like
I understand the convenience aspect, but we won’t learn how to make a product be more convenient for us if we abandon it everytime it gets difficult. With the Americans, they continue working on a product and make it more convenient over time rather than abandoning it because of all the issues that had popped up. See the F-35 program or the AIM-9M missile. The experience and knowledge gained from sticking with what seems like an inconvenient product, would only help with the next projects.
Nothing to do with that, just that we worked on so much vehicle it’s crazy to be able to think than a lot of time we got nothing at some update.
Just for giving and idea: this is just one list of French 20mm autocanon vehicle. We have list like that for 25mm, 30mm and more, and that’s just autocanon, not even talking about real gun or atgms and others :p
Which is the name of the potential radar because at the time that it was decided it was APG-65
Germany was actively sabotaging it
2 Likes
what are we even talking about?
German cope or something not really sure
I meant what project
Oh Eurofighter
Yes? This document is dated to either '90 or '91, this was still really early into the Eurofighter project, so no surprise that MSD-2000 wasn’t yet ready.
they wanted to put AN/APG-65 into it?
glad they chose a domestic row of radars instead
No, they specifically wanted an evolution of APG-65 called MSD-2000. Mytho is leaving out context (should I call it British cope or something? He’s also strawmanning so meh).
And CAPTOR-M wasn’t ready either and it was much superior
This isn’t even addressing my point lol. Anyhow this went too off-topic, I’m dropping the issue here.