I want type 42s to bomb in Argentine skyhawks.
3 Likes
South Africa already has Mirage
I really really doubt that what you are thinking/guessing is at all likely. I really don’t think that CVs will have damage output so large that they would outclass BBs as long as we don’t skip to mid 60s CV.
I would say that Iowa and other heavy AA platforms will quite well stack up against 50s and early 60s CVs and UK had only Eagle class in that years. I doubt that anything other then Eagle class or Centaur in their mid 60s config could stack up against Iowa/Yamato and I would say that I am being quite generous in these assessments.
I would say that Gaijin kinda backed themselves into a corner with their TT layout, objectives and DM.
Because I can hardly see how this layout is feasible and sensible with introduction of CVs and subs. Since now we have late/post war AA monsters like Des Moines or Alaska in the same BR bracket as WW1 dreadnoughts without refit.
Fitting CVs into that will huge mess and basically same thing can be said about submarines.
I think it would be much better and more logical to reformat the TT so there are BBs, DDs and cruisers from roughly same era in same BR bracket with appropriate map and gamemode adjustments needed. With that we could have soft BR split after the top BBs and then transition into 60s-70s CVs and proper missile DDGs capable of fair fight against them.
2 Likes
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t that one of the joint German-American projects for testing the engine nozzle vectoring?
Nvm, found it, it’s the Rockwell-MBB X-31.
1 Like
yes X-31 I found the name while looking for pictures
Desert warrior should be a SQN imo as its still a unique warrior platform. Then we would not really need FRES and that could be a premium with CSP a TT as you said.
That way we don’t incorporate Swedish tech into the main TT (though it is owned by BAE), whilst giving FRES a good spot and not rinsing the UK of a good IFV (Desert warrior)
This is very much true as I say in my post (shameless post plug), the G-3’s were entirely laid down to blackmail the US and Japan into signing the Washington Naval Treaty or find their entire fleets, and the entirety of their planned fleets, completely outmatched on almost a 1-to-1 basis.
But it still counts so British win, plus when you consider the keel was laid and the turrets started it could probably group to be like 5%
Supposedly they would have taken names off of Hood’s sister ships: Anson, Howe and Rodney and (probably) Nelson. But all of these names were used in later ships…
So it would probably be Project G-3
can’t wait :)
I say add Desert Warrior as squadron and CSP as TT in near upcoming updates and
add Ajax as TT and FRES as premium in later updates.
lol, but Gajin being Gajin won’t do that.
Desert Warrior was supposed to be added ages ago. lol
Desert warrior is what Britain needs, but in all fairness, its too weird to be in the TT - just like vehicles like the king Hussein modifications.
Have you ever stopped and thought why ?
Britain
F-111K - No plans
More Harrier variants - Not needed
EAP - test vehicle
Typhoon - too advanced
Do I need to go one ?
Let’s look at the other nations.
US at least an aircraft per update and a big one per 3 months.
Russia the same.
China get’s one now and then not as much as the previous but not as little as Britain.
Japan - it’s will soon get a pool of aircraft from Thailand.
Italy - just got Hungary
France - same boat as china.
7 Likes
I feel we will get one of those next update
2 Likes
Well that because when AMRAAMS come it will be needed. lol
1 Like
Yes if it doesn’t come i will riot
GR9A will come Brimstone is just too strong right now
1 Like
Yea and get we are in the wrong for wanting a stop gap vehicle from the Commonwealth.
I bet people are gonna say “oh what about the Bucc” from the last update.
Sad Israeli main sounds
1 Like
I mean you got like 3 aircraft since your fist F-16 at least lol
1 Like
Yay! mor copy paste lol
We practically still have no subtree…
If people complain about the Shar getting added i will rant like Vamilaid that they are wrong
2 Likes
What’s worse is that “Commonwealth is a bad faith argument” to them.
Despite Gaijin not only using it, they also turn around and ask for similar stuff under similar rules.
Like the Swiss Hornet or Brazilian Grippen.
3 Likes