yep because a 7.0 light tank is what we needed (the 9.3 to 11.7 gap with no light tanks)
2 Likes
I think I have asked before but wouldn’t the 30M have 3D thrust vectoring engines? If so…there is NO chance, most likely a modernized Flanker 27SM.
Well gaijin lacks a important skill in what is atcually needed.
Again look at the King tinger one of the only options for Sweden to get a heavy and you ether gonna pay and work now or ask the bank for a loan later . Lol
isnt the Su30SM more the equivalent to later F18s and the Eurofighter
Definitely will end up in the British tech tree.
3 Likes
Yea I cant see it being added in part from being a rare event vehichle for Germany if that
German hull which wasn’t made for Germany
3 Likes
If we use this argument then Britain should get the claim for the Buchon and the Casa 2.111 as you know Merlin engines and all lol
Vickers mk7 knowledge was re used for the Challenger 2
1 Like
technically speaking the hull was modified a lot with british components with only the drive train and steel remaining uneffected, but eh, I’ve got no skin in the game, I’d rather not see a Rhinemetall chally 130 at all, not a fan of dead end prototypes with little information avaible. The CR3’s are probably better in the vast majority of ways. + there’s a fully british Mk.7 we could get, (we have the Mk.7/2 iirc, the Mk.7/1 is a slightly older turret mounted on a Vickers Mk.4 hull)
2 Likes
Intresting and I haven’t seen you before on here, I hope you have a nice look around here. 😊
1 Like
hah, I’ve been in the RR&D threads for a while lmao, Just don’t have much to say, so don’t say anything at all. Thanks for the warm greeting though.
2 Likes
This only helps prove how much a true commonwealth tree is a bad idea.
It’s a get-every vehicle that ever existed tree.
1 Like
Yeah it would have to be limited to at most 3
1 Like
Ah, that guy.
He tried to claim the MMEV (the thing that was going to replace the ADATS in Canada) due to a camera.
Despite all of Canada working with the ADATS system was done through the Swiss.
1 Like
That guy just has outrageous takes
Literally gave me a document name that was 600 pages and goes the proof is there
They never used what he mentioned
He also just doesn’t believe in sub trees
1 Like
And I find them still whining over that to this day.
It’s been what two years now?
1 Like
It was made for a Leopard 2 which Britain most certainly does not use.
I think there is a slight difference between an engine and an entire hull or turret ;)
As far as I know from watching Long Shot and Growling Sidewinder in DCS, the Su-30SM can fight in close with the F22 and WIN. The combination of canards + 3D thrust vectoring engines + R73 is just to much for things like Rafale and Eurofighter in close even as good as they are :/ the 30SM with do the 141 and Harrier things by staying in close and just shooting 73’s. This only really works if it’s a 1v1…you get slow with multiple enemies close RIP But if given the choice to have 3D TVE…I would always take them. This is why I don’t see anything like a Flanker with them soon…when we have them we have 9X and all manor of things XD
So when are we getting a SEPv3 with lower fromt plate DU armor?
And, given our SEPv3, whats the chance gaijin says it doesnt get the armor upgrade because information otherwise was revealed to them in a dream?
1 Like