Yeah should also be exclusive to the RAF apaches
GB GB GB GB
1 Like
we have 2
Ersatz M10
2 Likes
snaps fingers
Damn, I knew it… I knew I forgot something!
you cant just forget our favorite ultra rare warcrime tank like that
1 Like
This looks pretty solid besides the fact that its tiny
Blended in a bit too well by the looks
I do like to play navy anyway but submarines are my biggest wish as well.
1 Like
The increment 2 was already tested with a tri-mode seeker and 16 km range (fired from the ground), so the US can get a counterpart seeing as it is mounted on the same M299 rails and has the same dimensions as AGM-114 and inc. 1 AGM-179 (depending on Brimstone range)
So a missile we know nothing about as it ain’t finished
Brimestone I would be 12km on a heil
I assume you have not classified test data confirming that range?
Back again with a funny question for y’all:
Anyone think we’ll be getting any more F-5s next update lmao
2 Likes
yep definitely
1 Like
Range depends what it is being fired from in this case an AH-64E which is gonna have less range then a Eurofighter
and im talking about Brimstone I which has much less range then Brimstone II
Brimstone II from just the ground has a range of 12Km
3 Likes
The options are running out but I can see a Chinese premium as the tien chien 1 testbed
1 Like
F-5 Tiger 2000
1 Like
Maybe the ship has sailed but still hoping for more J-7 and J-8 export variants as premium rather than stuck with J-7D
3 Likes
I would rather just buff the J-7D and give it PL-8 and its bomb load
4 Likes
That’s true but since Gaijin seems to think PL-8 is OP and reluctant to add, I have already lost hope
1 Like
Every other tree can grind with bombing bases but there are no Chinese prem that can do so. Granted the A-5C is an excellent fighter, its effectiveness is still suboptimal. It took me 370 kills plus 90 ish in F-104A and J-7E to get to the F-5E.
Suggestions are being made for the Chinese incendiary bombs to be mounted however, which might mean that Q-5s can potentially do so.
5 Likes
This is not testing data though.
You twll someone else that they are talking about a missile that they know nothing about and that isn’t finished (how do you test a missile that isn’t finished).
Yet you yourself are just throwing around a range number wirh pretty much no testing data to support it. What makes it so that I have to believe this number is true without back up data?