Wasn’t it Chinese? (Taiwan)
It was China. correct.
Japan already has the one they are adding.
(tho the US doesn’t)
I have no problem understanding Belgians talking French. It’s like US/UK, some differencies but you understand everything.
I have more problem with French Canadians, wich is probably closer to the “someone from Essex meet’s a guy from Yorkshire” for English people, even if i’m not sure about the difference in that example, except they are more heavy, and sometimes i almost don’t understand some sentances at all, but it’s mainly because of the really strong accent ^^
And for the few Cajuns i’ve listened to, i understand 2 words every 3 sentences xD
I can adjust my own accent depending on how much i want outsiders to understand.
It does?
No, the US doesn’t have a:
“P-51C-11-NT”
heck, it doesn’t even have a P-51C-11. much less the NT variant.
Yes, every part of the name matters in my work for an Air tree a single letter change and you’re dealing with a new variant.
example:
An “A-12X-CT” is not the same as an “A-12X-BT”. For WW2 aircraft all parts of the name are important otherwise you could be dealing with a different aircraft.
Does it need the P-51C-11?
No
Does it already have a P-51C?
Yes
The only difference is the meager change in kW
I hate how other countries are getting there Mustang variants they used.
China
France
Israel
Sweden
Who used the Mustang first ? Oh yea Britain how many have we got just 1 and not a brilliant one at that.
We were one of the main exports for it and hell it was made for us. But yea not even a Mustang IV.
1 Like
Ok but America needs another one that will play exactly identical to the one they have
The US don’t need another C they got one a unique one in fact.
Sure in WT the change is not all that noticeable. But in real life, it was enough to get a different name.
I was commenting on how the US didn’t have that variant that China is getting.
You can’t say the US has P-15C-11-NT because it doesn’t.
Yes, that’s what you implied to me.
The P-51C or P-15C-10 are not the same as the P-51C-11-NT they are not the same plane just the same family of planes.
But want you just told me variants are C&P.
So guess what the US doesn’t need the F-15C it’s a C&P of the F-15A.
The US tree it’s is a C&P tree. delete all Shermans but the M4 they are all C&P.
Variants exist but in Real Life, it was enough to be a different model.
NO.
Germany has nothing to do with Poland or that plane.
4 Likes
Leopard 2 PL
looky here, a Leo in Germany.
A German Tank.
Question? dose Germany have anything to do with the F-16? no see.
Nore do they have any clam on Poland. Heck from the polish I’ve talked o that’s has bad a South Korea in Japan.
Bishma:
Hunter:
argentinian vehicles going for germany stated by Smin himself
Argentina:
Spoiler
Spoiler
7 Likes
For now. it’s not permanent and can change as there was no official Argentinian sub-tree update/announcement.
However, the question was for a Polish F-16. And so my convo was in response to that.
Ayyy, can’t wait for my Argentinian F-16 in the German TT.
M8 that a Leo that was modded for Poland as of now there is no Polish tree so that’s the best place
1 Like