Yeah it should.
I think i might use it if/when we get a SB bracket where 11.0 is top. But right now, I dont massively see the point. Its a good aircraft though if you dont have the British Air tree researched, which is why I think it was added. As Britain has no premium CAS aircraft available to “skip” the air tree if you want top tier CAS
Wasn’t it Chinese? (Taiwan)
It was China. correct.
Japan already has the one they are adding.
(tho the US doesn’t)
I have no problem understanding Belgians talking French. It’s like US/UK, some differencies but you understand everything.
I have more problem with French Canadians, wich is probably closer to the “someone from Essex meet’s a guy from Yorkshire” for English people, even if i’m not sure about the difference in that example, except they are more heavy, and sometimes i almost don’t understand some sentances at all, but it’s mainly because of the really strong accent ^^
And for the few Cajuns i’ve listened to, i understand 2 words every 3 sentences xD
I can adjust my own accent depending on how much i want outsiders to understand.
It does?
No, the US doesn’t have a:
“P-51C-11-NT”
heck, it doesn’t even have a P-51C-11. much less the NT variant.
Yes, every part of the name matters in my work for an Air tree a single letter change and you’re dealing with a new variant.
example:
An “A-12X-CT” is not the same as an “A-12X-BT”. For WW2 aircraft all parts of the name are important otherwise you could be dealing with a different aircraft.
Does it need the P-51C-11?
No
Does it already have a P-51C?
Yes
The only difference is the meager change in kW
I hate how other countries are getting there Mustang variants they used.
China
France
Israel
Sweden
Who used the Mustang first ? Oh yea Britain how many have we got just 1 and not a brilliant one at that.
We were one of the main exports for it and hell it was made for us. But yea not even a Mustang IV.
Ok but America needs another one that will play exactly identical to the one they have
The US don’t need another C they got one a unique one in fact.
Sure in WT the change is not all that noticeable. But in real life, it was enough to get a different name.
I was commenting on how the US didn’t have that variant that China is getting.
You can’t say the US has P-15C-11-NT because it doesn’t.
Yes, that’s what you implied to me.
The P-51C or P-15C-10 are not the same as the P-51C-11-NT they are not the same plane just the same family of planes.
But want you just told me variants are C&P.
So guess what the US doesn’t need the F-15C it’s a C&P of the F-15A.
The US tree it’s is a C&P tree. delete all Shermans but the M4 they are all C&P.
Variants exist but in Real Life, it was enough to be a different model.
NO.
Germany has nothing to do with Poland or that plane.
Leopard 2 PL
looky here, a Leo in Germany.
A German Tank.
Question? dose Germany have anything to do with the F-16? no see.
Nore do they have any clam on Poland. Heck from the polish I’ve talked o that’s has bad a South Korea in Japan.
Bishma:
Hunter:
argentinian vehicles going for germany stated by Smin himself
Argentina:
For now. it’s not permanent and can change as there was no official Argentinian sub-tree update/announcement.
However, the question was for a Polish F-16. And so my convo was in response to that.
Ayyy, can’t wait for my Argentinian F-16 in the German TT.
