possible, but that is a more major modification
F15A needs better wings
I think you missed something more important
Swapping armament on the wings
I could be wrong, so if anyone has more knowledge on this, correct me please.
Spitfire wings were split into few types
There is early one with 8x .303 machine guns (Mk.I), later one with 4x .303 and 2x Hispano (Mk.II, Mk.V, Mk.IX).
Later on, you get 2x .50 machine guns and 2x Hispano (later Merlin powered and Griffons) and lastly you get 4x Hispano
Well no, since it 's one vehicle that represents both configurations we can guarantee there will never be a tech tree version.
Probably not, the " AA Machine gun " modification seems to have been scrapped since it 's disappearance in 2019 w/o ever being used.
ERA and add-on armour is the most reconfigure-ability the devs seem to be comfortable w/, since they’ve defended their representation of pintle MG availability in the past.
Maybe the Mad Thunder ui is testing armour reconfiguration while in the spawn screen, but I don’t think we have reason to think that ground vehicles being able to switch weapons is a possibility.
Guys look like the event leak list is legit…
looks like Sweden is getting a King tiger as a event vehicle, and Japan a P51C
Well, i like ww2 stuff, but come on.
1 Like
Hi @Smin1080p
I would like to share one reasoning.
Bhishma, Vijayanta, Jaguar IS - does this mean that Bharat (India) will be a subtree for the UK?
I have almost finished one of the main proofs that India should belong to another TT. I have considered this issue from all sides.
- The general attractiveness of TT if it is added to subtree,
- Filling holes of BR,
- The availability of premium equipment is better or unique than it already is in TT
- The gameplay difference from what is already in TT
- The economic benefit in addition (after all, war thunder is a commercial project, the developers set their main goal to be profitable)
All of these points are NOT suitable for TT Britain+India.
The idea of India subtree in GB - Stillborn.
I will be able to create topic about this in more detail in about a week, maybe earlier.
Just collecting proofs
2 Likes
Makes me want even more to have the coastal ship for France with the FL10 autoloading turret :p
3 Likes
Lots of ACs can pen MBTs from the front (especially the 2S38)
Also, IFVs or AFVs getting onto your flank is a regular occurrence if you play forward. It’s kinda their job to get on your flank.
Edit: sorry mods, didn’t see the no reply message :/
1 Like
All vehicles to the same tree does not mean a subtree, China could have all North Korean vehicles because they are based off Chinese designs, but this does not mean that North Korea is a subtree for China. Gaijin stated that they will add ex-CMW vehicles to Britain, but this does not mean any form of subtree. In this case, it was similar to Romania, where Hungary already took the subtree allocation(I dont like it, should be Romania), but Romanian vehicles would more or less go to Italy anyways.
Edit: vijayanta and shamsher are basically British designs anyways, the only controversial one is the bhishma.
5 Likes
It can be easily replaced by T-80U, that MOD of UK officially bought from USSR.
Are you considering Israel?
Japan already has a P-51C
India really should get an Isreal-style tree.
They are one of the commonwealth nations better suited for a TT. Outside of the dominions.
3 Likes
or…or stay with me here. They could also just give the existing F-4E its targeting pod and missing weapons and move it to 11.3 instead of adding a whole new one…
especially since for strictly game-play purposes the DMAS doesn’t have any difference from the one already in game outside of TISEO which doesn’t really add much to begin with.
I also found it odd that SPAA had its own sights and that camera from tank gunner sight was hard enabled.
I wonder what they were messing with there or if it was just event related and nothing else?
( I could also just be reading into it to much like always)
We haven’t announced any new Sub tree for the UK. Simply we have said it is open to the possibility of receiving more vehicles from commonwealth nations.
10 Likes
In that case, I will still say that India should complement another nation and not Britain.
:)
I found better TT for India
Leave thoses Mirages alone !
India should be its own tech tree, so we can have another redfor nation to help fix the matchmaker. Introduce India, and then fix the matchmaker by doing NATO vs non-NATO (India, Russia, China).
Either add India, or add another coalition tech tree made up of former Soviet satellites minus modern Russia (Warsaw).
1 Like