This is great example as its basically the same scenario as the SEPV2 with trophy
1 Like
No. This is all active measures, FSB produced this real-life AI video to make you think Russia has military vehicles. Russia does not even exist, that is also propaganda.
/s
1 Like
Like I didn’t choose not to have a Trophy enabled Abrams. You want that chunky 2.5t system on an already over-crowded turret, literally be my guest. 3OF26 is fine with that. Don’t forget the Leo2 that had it fitted too, XD
1 Like
I also hope for the SWIP or USMC Harrier
Im not even American main so i wouldn’t care give i just saw it as a good argument
1 Like
Hello there! Sorry for hijacking the thread for a second, but I would like you to vote and comment on this poll regarding M1A2 SEPv2’s non-removable TUSK 2 issue.
7 Likes
Maybe
You got my vote, feels wrong to take a tusk off of a beast though. Are you sure I won’t be put on a list?
2 Likes
Possibly, F-15J MSIP and Thai F-16A or Gripen.
Oh I don’t doubt it, but my comment was referring to how people expect just the retroactive addition and that’s all. I think that not only will they retroactively add it to certain aircraft, but they’ll add new ones for people to grind, potentially better aircraft, so there’s a carrot on the stick to chase. We already know for a fact Japan is going to have an ARH carrier as Gaijin has stated all nations will get one when introduced. So we know they’re adding new aircraft to support it.
For example, I can’t see them just adding ARH to F-16C and that’s it. They’ll probably also add the F-15C MSIP which is a better ARH carrier. For Russia, they could add it to the 29 SMT, but also add perhaps a newer Su-27 as well, and so on and so forth for other nations.
1 Like
Serial F-15Cs, yes. But according to ADA412578, F-15s started flight tests with HMD in 1993. This is before AESA were installed.
I just want the damn A-4M that’s been in the files for like 3 years now…
:(
2 Likes
The SEPv2 is already useless, adding more weight for something that is actually useful (unlike the deadweight TUSK II package) won’t make it more useless.
2 Likes
Actually, the rounds for 2s38 or any au-220 cannon is real, they even have telescoped version for the dart like hstvl
how does it perform on mobile?
I have literally repeated the words of dev, when they said, that abrams shouldn’t get du hull armor because its experimental feature that was only on several vehicles
Cope about it
Armata is alive, yes? But we wont buy it, becaaause…
And even a 57mm gun launched missile as I remember. used to shoot heli 5km away.
Oh, that’s the Bulat missile for anti drone/UAV or something like th, it’s part of the multi-weapon system which is for these rounds.
not this, a design concept I think.
similar to BAE’s 57mm gun launched missile
1 Like
Damn bro. That sounds like a US main problem. Lmao.
No cope, just love. Can’t wait for Armata too, gonna be fun!
Spoiler
someone is flag happy this morning…