Yeah, plenty of options to mitigate them. So hopefully wont be too far off. Its a bit annoying seeing principle A2G weapons denied because of GRB. Though would be so much fun in ASB.
But even without Brimstones, Gr9A and GR4 have a lot of potential
All Brimstones are F&F, they can be pre-programmed with a target and then fired and theyll go find that target. But they were upgraded with a Semi-Acitve laser seeker to add a “man in the loop” functionality. I would guess its that dual mode seeker we would get and a hard requirement for a Tpod
3 Likes
Ah yes, exactly like how they trialed VT1 on their FlaRakRad /s
hey would take our developed alternative preferedly as well LFKNG if i remember right
Nah, youre thinking of the HFK, the hypersonic replacement for the Roland 3
LFKNG was the minature IRIS-T they wanted to fit to the Ozelot, Tiger UHT and a few other things
1 Like
I don’t disagree and we have a convenient out to avoid AESA with XF-2A + APG-68. I don’t know what other top tier it could besides those two though, F-2 or F-15J and F-15J MSIP is the obvious next step with Fox 3s on the horizon.
1 Like
Mmmm, 13.7+ jet.
Not for next major obviously since we don’t even have AARHs yet.
@Lord_Prism
Yeah, this was internally reported many weeks ago, one of staff talked about it soon after the major update.
So they’re already working on it likely for next major update.
3 Likes
Cough Not ours.
On nou le baguette canonne
I’ve seen gibberish with more meaning that that, but ok.
Working on a new top tier jet for Japan you mean? or something else?
If so, what do you think it could be?
Vertical stabilizer control speed fixes.
I expect Leclerc to be the fastest gun laying main battle tank in the game next major.
3 Likes
Oh I see. That makes sense.
Speaking of which, are the Type 10s one accurate? I remember when they were introduced they were just copy pasted from Type 90s.
Wait they gonna work on different type/“quality” of stabilizer?
Control speed of Type 10 is likely accurate.
@Hyrikul
We don’t know, the last communication from staff was with David Bowie answering the question “Is Gaijin going to separate stab & control speeds to fix the bug or fix it another way before separating the speeds?” in a Discord with “I can’t answer that, I’m not a developer and I don’t know how the developers would solve it”
That was the joke. The F-18 leak was also fake.
1 Like
there still are just a copy paste. They need a source to change it but there neither is a source saying that its faster (despite videos showing it but gajin doesnt accept video proof) and there are also no sources saying it is the same speed as Type 90
so by this point the turret rotation and aiming speed for the type 10 is just a soft balancing value
1 Like
Yeah sure, I’m also on the same opinion that the Japanese decided a new generation MBT does NOT need a better vertical drive than their MBT from the 90s.
Actually not even that, they went even further and just re-used the same systems used on the Type 90! Man, the Japanese sure know how to save on the expenses
Control speed =/= stabilizer speed.
For example the Germans use the same exact vertical control speed of 10 degrees per second from Leopard 2 [first one] through at least Leopard 2A6, likely to present.
And Americans use 24 degrees per second from first Abrams through SEP3.
Type 10’s control speed is 8 degrees per second in-game BTW.
Control speed = input from the gunner.