the 105 leFH18B2 , wee could argue , but wee all know how gaijin will implement if they ever do
Spoiler's
they will only put it in the german tree and will found a stupid reason to justifie themself’s , wouldn’t be the first time … yea i’m looking at you Pz.Sp.Wg.P204(f) KwK
how does having the same sight magnification and fov without the thermals makes it a better sight? it currently has the exact same magnification as the t80b. 3.9x-9.0x.
Having thermals is and advantage overall, not just in larger maps, it helps you at spotting in every map, specially when it is foggy, rainy or in a map that has lots of threes and bushes.
And the better ballistics are obviously an advantage, but the only practical change that it makes is that you need to lead less on moving targets.
Let’s put it simple me and other like @battlerog are getting tired of your narrow view of the world.
Other prove facts = Propaganda
Others correct you on a vehicle = cry wishlisting
Someone like to have banter = Literally talk dirt about you to others right in front of ya.
This is way it so easy to annoy you because you have a narrow view.
How is it embarrassing? That’s an unnecessary snark comment.
Batignolles-Chatillons Automoteur 155 (1947) - Not built
Batignolles-Chatillons Automoteur 155 (1952) - Not built
Batignolles-Chatillons Automoteur 155 (1955) - Built
Batignolles-Chatillons Automoteur 155 (1958) - Not Built
AMX40-auF1 - Built
AMX-13 105 AM “Tous Azimuts” - Built
AMX 13 155-50 (Tube de 30 calibres) - Not built
AMX 13 155-50 (Tube de 23 calibres) - Not built
ELC AMX 105 HM2 - Not built
ELC AMX 105-50 - Not built
Lorraine 155 mle. 51 - Built
AMX 105 AM mle. 47 - Not built
Batignolles-Châtillon 12t artillery (1948) - Not built
Batignolles-Châtillon 12t artillery (1950) - Not built
FCM 12t artillery vehicle - Not built
That’s four additional vehicles out of the fifteen listed.
Ngl, I want them to accelerate and keep pushing so we get to the fun stuff before they decide to focus on other things. For example, as a Japan main, I’m really looking forward to the early F-2 variants and hope to see it as soon as the next update, if not, I hope they keep progressing so that maybe the next update after might have a chance.
CBA to go and find the comment, but after the backlash of Britain getting the Gripen C first, it was confirmed that Sweden was getting the Gripen C in March
edit:
actually found it quite easily, remembered where it was said:
Again, I’m thinking mostly chemical protection. I don’t know about anyone else, but I basically never aim from the UFP on any tank. I checked the protection analysis to better comprehend the differences, and the 30mm plate that is default to the T-80B hull is as sufficient a change as the T-80U hull’s default composition. The minor segments of the UFP that are penetrable by DM23 really aren’t much to write home about. I’m still going to aim differently in that situation.
L26, JM33, 1985-I, and M322 all going to perform similarly on the BV hull without ERA as they would on the B hull with ERA. (L26 and M322 are going to cut through both easily).
I don’t know what the sights will be like, but better ballistics doesn’t mean much when most tanks barely require much aiming anyways. Ballistics really only matter in the pen/post pen area.
7 seconds really isn’t the end of the world, 10 seconds is a problem, potentially. I’m going to play the same style as every other Russian tank I have, but I’m gonna have to be even more careful.