If carriers are gonna get added add the mega funi HMS Lion Hybrid-Carrier and the IJN Ise
damn dude the object 292 its too op it dosent even have crew to kill and it has a stupidly low profile
in fact ITS INVISIBLE
Great event ship potential or premium
When vittorio venetos and sovietsky soyuz set sail, maybe the French will finally get their hand on dunkerque
the invasion has begun the trucks are gonna take over war thunder prepare
driver ready!
My bug report for the 292 not having the 1250hp engine was acknowledged, so with any luck it should receive it once added to the game. Itโs not a huge change but still a decent buff over the 1100hp of the T-80B
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/p5oFXmwVp124
Why something with better gun and shell, with better armor
Is the same br as turms)
Again no russian bias?
It at least should be 10.3 or 10.7 for sure
Its like um2, which payed for 692mm penetration with its kontakt-5
But its useless to change something in russian game, where top developers play on soviets)
I find it quite cute that everyone screams Russian Bias or Russian Game because that vehicle is 10.0 and its main reasoning for that are the penetration and gun, but they are often forgetting about all the negatives of this vehicle.
Nevertheless it should be higher than 10.0, yes, but your arguments are quite laughable at best.
The 10 sec reload is definitely gonna have a big impact on gameplay, so will be interesting to see how it balances out with the firepower and mobility
For blind
Not gonna impact, because by default they will be โlive stonesโ
Not only because of that
There is no indication for that.
Thatโs not how it works.
While data such as the economy data for the Object 292 can be added in background updates, models have to be added in client updates. Wait for the next one. (Likely tomorrow, Monday.)
Ok then, im waiting for your full argument about it then.
Any plan moving 11.7 Helicopters to rank VIII?
What would be the point of that, helicopters already have end-of-line research costs starting at Rank 6.
Only proposal.
Nope.
I highly doubt it has it.
If you look at Agava-2 history and tanks that had it mounted, you wont see 292 listed there.
T-80B has Agava, not the Agava-2.
Itโs only same quility because they are both gen-1 thermals, and as of today we work of a system that only needs to know generation of thermal to determine its quility.