Ah that fair I can understand that.
I guess if anymore nations get a sub tree then it would be ether a no home line for it and just be placed randomly in the correct areas like the SAAF Gripen or a tab of it’s own with in a nation.
It hasn’t been explicitly confirmed that the German one is coming next update, however there is no reason currently to believe it’s not coming then.
So what ? The ARM 's will have little utility against player SAM 's, yet we have evidence those weapons are being developed too.
We already have air-launched AShM 's ingame, and clues towards more being added. Honestly, it makes more sense that they’re coming since we already have target types suitable for them.
Very informative hope when you want to start adding more line later you guys find a work around
Hasn’t happened yet we will see
I have a question: how is that French DF105 equivalent that was promised over two years ago coming along?
1 Like
That’s unfortunate.
Mirage 2000D-RMV would be 12.7 material and located after Mirage 2000D-R1 & Mirage 2000D-R2
I guess gaijin add Mirage 2000D-R2 before Mirage 2000D RMV because carries IR SRAAM 2x Magic II but equipped 3rd generation targeting pod Thales Damocles, Twin bomb racks, for guided bombs on the wing, Apache anti-runway cruise missile and Addition of GPS/INS guidance AASM-Hammer
1 Like
R2 would be kinda pointless honestly
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uhUnfeuPnFDr
Made a report to try and get the Mig-27K labeled as a strike fighter once more.
8 Likes
They really need to overhaul vehicle labels and add new ones.
3 Likes
I mean something like “Air superiority fighter” and “Light Fighter” is pretty much all we need currently.
7 Likes
The big one that I think needs to be in the game is “Multi-Role”. Although tbh I don’t think they need to get too crazy with how we distinguish planes for gameplay sake, as people end up playing fighters as attackers and attackers as fighters.
I’m trying to get the 27 fixed as it is a dedicated strike plane at the end of the day, and has already been eclipsed by other planes in capabilities, yet somehow is labeled a fighter…
5 Likes
My guy, VIIII is not nine in roman numerals. It’s IX
2 Likes
It says rank VIII, it was just quickly assembled as a showcase
2 Likes
asking for rank 9 is like asking for premium f-16s. Why not just expand the BRs within rank 8?
9 Likes
Rank 9 should be for gen 5s and gen 4s with Meteors, AIM-120Ds, etc.
Meme I made in 2022.
8 Likes
I’m all for accuracy, but in terms of gameplay, does it matter?
Or is it something that matters only for GRB? Because no planes get an air spawn after a certain rank anyway.