I wouldn’t mind seeing Japan dethrone Germany at all, 2 years is a long time to rule particularly as until recently they also ruled cruiser tiers too.
UK is always likely to be left behind in some capacity at top tier although faring better than others.
But colorado and Nelson/rodney could also appear with Mutsu. I’m not sure what they’d do with 16-inch armed battleships. are they better or worse than things like KGV/Bismarck, littorio, richelieu etcetera. IRL they were different but equal. In-game I suspect the brute force of these ships may be better leaving no room for those other ships.
Naval is such a cluster of strange balancing decisions its impossible to predict.
My bug report for the 292 not having the 1250hp engine was acknowledged, so with any luck it should receive it once added to the game. It’s not a huge change but still a decent buff over the 1100hp of the T-80B https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/p5oFXmwVp124
It at least should be 10.3 or 10.7 for sure
Its like um2, which payed for 692mm penetration with its kontakt-5
But its useless to change something in russian game, where top developers play on soviets)
I find it quite cute that everyone screams Russian Bias or Russian Game because that vehicle is 10.0 and its main reasoning for that are the penetration and gun, but they are often forgetting about all the negatives of this vehicle.
Nevertheless it should be higher than 10.0, yes, but your arguments are quite laughable at best.
While data such as the economy data for the Object 292 can be added in background updates, models have to be added in client updates. Wait for the next one. (Likely tomorrow, Monday.)
