Yeah probably :D
This is strange, whether it is the upcoming festival, the background image, or the accompanying textures and decorations all point to China and the year of Loong in China,. But the activity vehicle is actually a Russian vehicle
3 Likes
Just like how they let America have the best SARH missile carrier for… How long? More than half a year?
1 Like
Yeah, they dropped the ball entirely
2 Likes
in the first update already.
If its Russian, all exeptions will be made and used. Just to add it.
Oh bro, you’re losing even more credibility!
Apex predator 7 vehicles? Are you counting the tornado of events, the updated visual model of the Ferdinand or the new helicopter cockpits? lol
3 Likes
Yep, its probably also going to be an OP Tank Destroyer by the looks of things. Weak armour but will probably one shot any 11.7 tank. Likely added to counter spall liners
2 Likes
Because of course it’s one of the few country with spall liner that need something to counter them…
That list is wrong. Germany got in the apex predator update the lazur, tornado, V990 and Z47. 4 vehicles. 5 if you count the even tornado
They were talking about Germany afaik, not Russia.
1 Like
They arent really lacking either
2 Likes
Of course.
I mean what is the point in grinding rank 7 Russia now that you can make up a useful line just by non tt vehicles
2 Likes
I see easy 3 points for that :
Money,
Money,
And, of course, money.
3 Likes
Sure Germany, Russia and the US aren’t lacking event vehicles. Guess Gaijin should have put all ebrs as event vehicles
1 Like
Specially the most know one…
The most used French prop of WW2 is also as event or BP.
10 nations in game. 3 have loads, 7 have few (especially at higher tiers, most have none) pretty logical where event vehicles should be placed.
This one obviously should have been China
So you want more event vehicles for nations which lack tech tree options already? Despite that even the big tree have areas they lack in. US lacks in early war tanks, Germany in Cold war jets and russia in wheeled tanks/ifvs
What has one got to do with the other?
Nothing stopping them from adding both to minor nations.
You are essentially say:
“Why do you want to add more vehicles to nations that lack vehicles. lets instead add vehicles to nations that have an abundance of choice already, because they need more vehicles”