Bummer, would’ve been a nice excuse to have a Block III Super Hornet 🥲
We could always get the F/A-18XT for a twin seat super hornet. Would be a Block III but with enough differences for it to be added.
1 Like
Good thing someone suggested it.
2 seater Super Hornet to USA:
The question now is… Premium vehicle or TT?
Personally I think as a squadron vehicle. Have an E Block III in the TT either after or foldered with the Block II with tha XT being a top tier squadron vehicle.
Why the interest for a Super Hornet F?
Super Hornet E is literally, LITERALLY identical in every possible way, except that it performs marginally better for being lighter.
Because it looks cooler than the single seat. Also it’s right there already in-game it should be simple enough to slap US markings on it and chuck it in a folder with the E.
4 Likes
An entire vehicle added to a tree over a minor visual difference between it and the one already present in the tree…?
Wouldn’t be the first time
What, rn ?
Yes, going for the next 5 days until 2026-08-24T13:00:00Z
2 Likes
Tornado’s Kormoran launchers might actually be a better fit. The interface for AS.34 is overall similar to AS.37. Both missiles were derived from Nord’s AS.33 INS-guided missile project.
Don’t really have a good image of the front pin cross-section on the Kormoran though, to compare it to Martel
1 Like
i mean i mostly agree but also twin seaters are generally cooler looking imo
Could be nice in the future for Sim to be able your friend to be the second crewmember
1 Like
Huh, never noticed the similarities in missile shape with Komorans and B83
Btw do you know if Komorans have any big bug reports currently up or is their current performance in game the best they’ll get for the time?
Where Submarines lol
Depends how you define minor. For me the F/A-18E is one of the ugliest modern jets while the F/A-18F, whilr not the best looking, is much further up there.
2 Likes
The F/A-18E is appaling
The F is much cooler
