Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
6326

It’s a Norwegian variant. The only nation ever intended to service it was Norway. It has no historical significance outside of the Norwegian tank competition.

I wouldn’t support it if it was just an existing product offered to Norway, but it was actually modified for this purpose, so I think it deserves this place. For comparison if there was a K2 variant specifically made for Germany that wasn’t adopted, I still think Germany would be the place for that rather than Korea, and I think this standard should apply to any vehicle.

5 Likes
6327

I love how my CVT has like 10 gears

1 Like
6328

Don’t waste your breath m8, he’s one of the last holdouts thinks that all tech trees must be pure.

3 Likes
6329

With that level of confidence, surely you can just link a source stating that the protection/armour of the lower-glacis/lfp had been improved with SEPv3, right?

6330

Hi @Smin1080p_WT as of currently the report for TWS ESA for the AN/MPQ-64 is marked as fixed and commented with “Will be fixed in the next major update.”
Will reports for other radars such as HARD 3D, TRML-4D, exMHR, etc, finally getting fixed with the next update as well? They’ve been marked as accepted for quite a while now.
Thank you for your work as always

1 Like
6331

i ate the reports

6332

gib em back >:(

1 Like
6333

They said that before the Heavy Cavalry update, meaning whatever they fixed (not TWS ESA) is already here
image
image

6334

it was during the dev server and some reports at that period were marked with “Will be fixed in this major update.”
so with some hopium I think they meant the upcoming one
bummer if they did “fix” it tho :( even took away the backscan beam

1 Like
6335

image

2 Likes
6336

image

?

1 Like
6337

Whats up with these riddles and what do you win

6338

Depends on if they do order of operations properly or not. Could be 299 if you do it left to right

6339

I do not know what you win but probs a premium or sth

1 Like
6340

why is the left Abrams in the lowest formula only 12 instead of 52?

wouldn’t we expect it to be

80 + 52*52/16 = 249?

6341

the Abrams on the left does not have ERA, so u minus the ERA from the Abrams.

6342

But what do you minus? 40? 20? more?

6343

You follow BIDMAS (or PEMDAS or whatever different one taught in school.)

This instance you pretty much work it backwards to get 119.

6344

40, since that’s the control value

6345

image
image1238×1020 331 KB

52-1560 in theory