idk i just guessed
the challenger hull on that style turret just looks so damn cool (not as good as the streetfighter though)
because australia is rightfully a british subtree
idk i just guessed
the challenger hull on that style turret just looks so damn cool (not as good as the streetfighter though)
because australia is rightfully a british subtree
canada is definitely amess being spread between 3 different trees
not even the worst one in the brit tree



I guess, still a bit funny to me
@Smin1080p_WT now the aussie M1A1 AIM is officially in the british tree is there a possibility of the american sqaudron one being changed from an aussie AIM to the USMC AIM actually used by the americans?
Thats neat part, they never called it a Challenger 130 or similar.
Also at the bottom of the same page:
I firmly believe we can indeed go worse
because as smin said earlier they often add a squadron vehicle from the nation they plan to add to that tree? hence the M1A1 AIM going to the british tree as a squadron tank, also US mains would have cried if it was added as just a tech tree tank
i have no idea what any of this proves
Why would we ever need a subtree? There’s an unbelievable amount of vehicles still missing from the US. (Especially light tanks)
they should have kept the 5th line as the SA / Sub tree line
yes I thought he said to put it in the tree that the teaser vehicle was added in?
Clearly it’s a British program because it’s a challenger and not a independent German program unrelated to the British
mostly to secure vehicles that rightfully belong in the US tree anyways
very true.
this exists

Basically just saying you were wrong calling it challanger times like 5
Japan is just becoming a sub tree when it gets south k (I don’t think USA will get it) it will be the biggest sub tree in game
well is it not a challenger?
It was never called it in German hands no.
SK would be a TT with NK in it, a combined tree. So SK won’t go to Japan or US